Evaluative Judgement in Teaching AI-based Translation: A Class-room Case Study of AI-Mediated Translation and Post-Editing
Summary
This paper presents a classroom case study on teaching AI-based translation and post-editing, focusing on the development of evaluative judgement in students.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/16/26, 11:49 AM
# Evaluative Judgement in Teaching AI-based Translation: A Class-room Case Study of AI-Mediated Translation and Post-Editing Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15483](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15483) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
The impact of postediting on AI generative translation in Yemeni context: Translating literary prose by ChatGPT
This academic study on arXiv examines ChatGPT-4's performance in translating literary prose between Arabic and English, involving 30 professional translators who evaluated and postedited AI-generated translations. The research finds that while AI improves translation speed, human postediting remains essential for handling cultural, stylistic, and figurative language aspects, suggesting a human-machine collaboration model rather than full automation.
Teaching with AI
OpenAI shares perspectives from educators on integrating AI tools like ChatGPT into teaching, including using AI for language support and teaching students to think critically about AI-generated information.
Surfacing Isolated Learners with Outcome-Independent Mediation of Feedback between Teachers and Students Using AI
This paper proposes an interpretable decision layer for AI-augmented classrooms that combines teacher and student feedback to rank course topics needing attention without using grades. The approach surfaces isolated learners and aligns with instructor concerns in a preliminary study.
Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans
This study investigates the use of student-written counterarguments to AI-generated content to foster critical thinking in an educational context, and finds that frontier LLMs can evaluate such submissions with moderate agreement to human assessors.
Agentic AI Translate: An Agentic Translator Prototype for Translation as Communication Design
This paper introduces Agentic AI Translate, an agentic translator prototype that replaces the traditional text-in/text-out paradigm with a four-stage agentic cycle grounded in translation studies theory, aiming to reframe translation as communication design rather than text conversion.