Evaluative Judgement in Teaching AI-based Translation: A Class-room Case Study of AI-Mediated Translation and Post-Editing

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

This paper presents a classroom case study on teaching AI-based translation and post-editing, focusing on the development of evaluative judgement in students.

arXiv:2606.15483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Drawing on 23 anonymized student pro-jects from a fourth-year Machine Transla-tion and Post-editing course in a BA-level translation programme, this paper exam-ines how structured comparison of gen-eral-purpose LLMs and online MT sys-tems can elicit evaluative judgement in AI-mediated translation. Students translat-ed short specialised English Wikipedia texts into Catalan or Spanish, generated four system outputs, evaluated them using automatic metrics and human adequa-cy/fluency assessment, selected one output for post-editing, and justified their deci-sion in written reports. Descriptive counts are reported for all 23 projects, while qualitative interpretation is based on the 22 cases accompanied by written reports. Results show that students did not treat automatic metrics as final authority: final post-editing selections often diverged from metric rankings and were justified through adequacy, fluency, terminology, naturalness, and expected post-editing ef-fort. The study therefore does not bench-mark systems under controlled conditions; it analyses how students justified system choice within an authentic classroom as-signment.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/16/26, 11:49 AM

# Evaluative Judgement in Teaching AI-based Translation: A Class-room Case Study of AI-Mediated Translation and Post-Editing
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15483](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15483)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

The impact of postediting on AI generative translation in Yemeni context: Translating literary prose by ChatGPT

arXiv cs.CL

This academic study on arXiv examines ChatGPT-4's performance in translating literary prose between Arabic and English, involving 30 professional translators who evaluated and postedited AI-generated translations. The research finds that while AI improves translation speed, human postediting remains essential for handling cultural, stylistic, and figurative language aspects, suggesting a human-machine collaboration model rather than full automation.

Teaching with AI

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI shares perspectives from educators on integrating AI tools like ChatGPT into teaching, including using AI for language support and teaching students to think critically about AI-generated information.

Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans

arXiv cs.CL

This study investigates the use of student-written counterarguments to AI-generated content to foster critical thinking in an educational context, and finds that frontier LLMs can evaluate such submissions with moderate agreement to human assessors.