@cline: GPT-5.6 sets a new Terminal-Bench record at 91.9%. Priced the same as GPT 5.5 at $5/$30 per million tokens. With Fable …
Summary
GPT-5.6 sets a new Terminal-Bench record at 91.9%, priced the same as GPT-5.5 at $5/$30 per million tokens, while Fable moves to API with higher costs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/10/26, 10:10 AM
GPT-5.6 sets a new Terminal-Bench record at 91.9%. Priced the same as GPT 5.5 at 5/30 per million tokens.
With Fable getting pulled from Claude subscriptions and moving to API cost (~2x as expensive at 10/50), we are glad to see @OpenAI’s commitment to accessibility. https://t.co/CqiI6iPfBM
Similar Articles
@sama: GPT-5.6 sol is half the price and ~twice as token efficient as fable in many cases for accomplishing the same task. hap…
Sam Altman announces that GPT-5.6 sol is half the price and roughly twice as token efficient as fable for many tasks, with plans to deliver at one-quarter of the price.
GPT-5.5 may burn fewer tokens, but it always burns more cash
OpenAI's GPT-5.5 costs 49–92% more than GPT-5.4 in practice despite claimed token efficiency improvements, while Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 also raised effective costs by 12–27% for longer prompts, reflecting a broader trend of rising frontier model prices as both companies face massive projected losses.
@VraserX: GPT-5.6 Sol is sounding absolutely insane. 25% of the cost of Fable. 750 tokens per second. And even smarte than Mythos…
GPT-5.6 Sol is claimed to be extremely fast (750 t/s) and cost-efficient (25% of Fable's cost) while outperforming Mythos, potentially resetting the market.
@reach_vb: DeepSWE 1.1: GPT 5.6 Sol delivers the highest score at less than half the cost
DeepSWE 1.1 highlights GPT-5.6 Sol, which achieves top scores at half the cost and roughly twice the token efficiency of Fable, according to Sam Altman.
@PrajwalTomar_: https://x.com/PrajwalTomar_/status/2075532429641809935
GPT 5.6 is a family of three tiers (Sol, Terra, Luna) priced significantly lower than competing models like Claude's Fable 5, achieving top scores on coding benchmarks but falling short on ambiguous, high-complexity tasks where Fable excels, suggesting a role-based division where Fable serves as a manager and Sol as a senior worker.