DOPD: Dual On-policy Distillation

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

DOPD proposes a dual on-policy distillation paradigm that dynamically routes token-level supervision between privileged teacher and student policies based on advantage gaps and probabilities, addressing privilege illusion and improving capability transfer in LLMs and VLMs.

On-policy distillation (OPD) offers superior capacity transfer by supervising student-sampled trajectories with dense token-level signals. To furnish high-quality supervision sources and thereby elevate the performance frontier of distillation, an intuitive direction is to infuse privileged information to either teacher or student itself. However, this additional input induces a potential failure mode we dub privilege illusion: a pattern that conflates the transferable capability gap that students are meant to close, and the information asymmetry gap that can only be mimicked but never replicated. This issue is further amplified by the inherent non-uniformity of token-level supervision, where only a small subset of tokens carries pivotal capability-bearing signals. To this end, we propose DOPD, an advantage-aware dual distillation paradigm that dynamically routes token-level supervision between privileged teacher and privileged student policies based on their advantage gap and relative probabilities. Each token receives supervision of different strength, objective, and strategy from either teacher or student itself, which transfers credible capability while simultaneously receiving auxiliary signals, to alleviate privilege illusion. Extensive experiments on both large language model (LLM) and vision-language model (VLM) settings demonstrate that DOPD consistently outperforms Vanilla OPD and other counterparts. Further results on stability, robustness, continual learning, and out-of-distribution tasks validate its superiority.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/01/26, 03:40 AM

Paper page - DOPD: Dual On-policy Distillation

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.30626 Published on Jun 29

#2 Paper of the day Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

DOPD addresses privilege illusion in on-policy distillation by dynamically routing token-level supervision between teacher and student policies based on advantage gaps and probabilities, improving capability transfer in large and vision-language models.

On-policy distillation(OPD) offers superior capacity transfer by supervising student-sampled trajectories with densetoken-level signals. To furnish high-quality supervision sources and thereby elevate the performance frontier of distillation, an intuitive direction is to infuseprivileged informationto either teacher or student itself. However, this additional input induces a potential failure mode we dubprivilege illusion: a pattern that conflates the transferable capability gap that students are meant to close, and the information asymmetry gap that can only be mimicked but never replicated. This issue is further amplified by the inherent non-uniformity of token-level supervision, where only a small subset of tokens carries pivotal capability-bearing signals. To this end, we propose DOPD, anadvantage-aware dual distillationparadigm that dynamically routes token-level supervision between privileged teacher and privileged student policies based on their advantage gap and relative probabilities. Each token receives supervision of different strength, objective, and strategy from either teacher or student itself, which transfers credible capability while simultaneously receiving auxiliary signals, to alleviateprivilege illusion. Extensive experiments on both large language model (LLM) and vision-language model (VLM) settings demonstrate that DOPD consistently outperforms Vanilla OPD and other counterparts. Further results on stability, robustness, continual learning, and out-of-distribution tasks validate its superiority.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606\.30626

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.30626 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.30626 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.30626 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

MOPD: Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for Capability Integration in LLM Post-Training

Hugging Face Daily Papers

MOPD proposes a multi-teacher on-policy distillation paradigm for LLM post-training, enabling efficient integration of multiple domain capabilities by distilling specialized RL teachers into a student model using its own rollouts. It outperforms existing methods like Mix-RL and Cascade RL, and has been deployed in industrial-scale models.

Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation via Peer Successes and Failures

arXiv cs.LG

Introduces Multi-Rollout On-Policy Distillation (MOPD), a method that conditions the teacher on both successful and failed peer rollouts to provide denser token-level supervision for language model post-training, improving performance across multiple benchmarks.

OPRD: On-Policy Representation Distillation

Hugging Face Daily Papers

OPRD proposes a new knowledge distillation method that aligns student and teacher hidden states across layers during on-policy rollouts, eliminating sampling variance from token-space KL estimation. Empirically, OPRD outperforms output-space baselines on math reasoning benchmarks (AIME 2024/2025, AIMO) while being 1.44x faster and using 54% less memory.

On-Policy Distillation (5 minute read)

TLDR AI

This paper introduces on-policy distillation, which trains a student model on its own trajectories with teacher token-level KL supervision to fix train-inference mismatch, unifying forward-KL, reverse-KL, and JSD losses, with reverse-KL favored for smaller students.