The great memory panic of 2026 – Asymco

# The great memory panic of 2026 Source: [https://asymco.com/2026/05/11/the-great-memory-panic-of-2026/](https://asymco.com/2026/05/11/the-great-memory-panic-of-2026/) [***Office Hours***](https://asymco.com/category/officehours/)*question asked by by Ian H\. on May 1, 2026* **Q: Memory prices could move from 15% to 40% of the BOM of a device\. This seems incredible\. So how can Apple deal with this?** This has been on people’s minds now for what, three, four months? I think since January\. I call it the Great Panic of 2026\. The great memory panic\. First of all, you have to understand the scale that Apple operates at\. The number of devices in the hundreds of millions\. It’s not just iPhones, obviously\. All of the Apple products consume some memory\. And there’s a lead time\. When you’re dealing with scale, there’s a lead time\. There’s usually a couple years of lead time\. And every supplier who works with Apple is doing it because they love volumes\. Now, volumes are good for suppliers because they can also predict things in their own operations\. They can plan, they can raise capital\. Usually they need loans to do that, and they get good terms on loans if it’s a long\-term payback\. And there’s a lot of moving parts there that benefit scale\. The difference with memory pricing that we’re seeing a lot of anxiety around is at the margin\. That is to say, there’s a base production, and then there’s a variable production\. That variable production comes when somebody orders, “Hey, can I have something next month?” And the smaller suppliers tend to not have that long\-term planning or the volumes that can fill the pipe\. And so the marginal pricing on memory has gone through the roof\. It spiked, and that’s what we’re seeing\. But that’s on the variable bit\. So Apple negotiates on the base load\. Now, of course, that marginal cost is going to eventually infect, if it continues long enough, base price\. In fact, suppliers are going to say, well, even if it’s two years out, we’re going to have to ask for more, because there’s so many other players that also we anticipate will be two years out\. But then Apple can negotiate on another basis and say, well, if you don’t do us a favor here and give us a better rate, then maybe we won’t work with you when all this settles down\. You know things are going to settle down\. These things are always cyclical\. There’s never been a semiconductor boom that’s not followed by a semiconductor bust\. Never\. And they know it\. So they’re happy to make mint on this volatility right now\. So much so that I heard Samsung’s making more money now with memory than Nvidia’s making with their processors\. So memory suddenly is the new gold\. A year ago, two years ago, it was about compute\. Now it’s memory\. Who knows what’s next? [Subscribe to**Asymco One**for full access to our live Q&As\.](https://asymco.com/one/#subscribe)But if you’re in this business for the long term, and you want to play games, Apple’s going to be there a lot longer\. You could believe that AI is going to be going at this rate forever\. We’ll see if the profit model can sustain it\. But I just speak from experience\. There’s a lot of these things that happen in the phone space with all kinds of components\. There were always some shortages\. There was storage\. The iPod killed a hard drive supply chain\. Apple monopolized the CNC machines that made the aluminum Macs\. And these things happen\. By the way, that monopoly is no longer in effect\. Eventually, somebody built enough of the tooling and sold them to Apple’s competitors\. And if they want to make an aluminum enclosure, they can do so now\. But that’s how it is in this game, and nobody plays it as well as Apple does\. If you read the book on China —*Apple in China*— there’s a lot of anecdotes about this\. So I can’t get excited about any of these stories about supply crunches, other than there being a windfall for somebody and an anxiety, a panic for somebody else\. And again, other analysts are starting to come around to notice that maybe this all settles into Apple gaining a whole lot of share, because all the other competitors won’t be able to get any memory\. So Apple could also just lock up everything and say, alright, we’ve got the biggest checkbook in the business, we’ll take a hit on margins\. As if we care, as if that matters\. We go from 49% to 45%\. Which is where we were two years ago\. And then in doing so, we’re going to take out everybody but Samsung\. So we get in a situation where a lot of marginal players just disappear\. And Apple locks up even more\. And when you go for the jugular, you do all this, and then you launch a low\-end product that’s even cheaper, which is what the Neo looks like to me\. I mean, Neo might be a prototype\. The Neo might be John’s trial balloon out there\. Maybe he has a theory — I’m just speculating now — that Apple is going to go for the jugular on the iPhone in a couple of years\. The iPhone’s going to be $499\. It’ll be as good as the best iPhone today\. And they’re going to launch that against a landscape where everybody else is losing money at $800 a phone\. And so they’ll just quit\. Now, it’s uncharacteristic, but it’s a low\-end disruption coming from Apple\. It’s completely possible\. It’s well within their ability\. And if they want to, they could\. There’s a lot going on here with what strategic intent is from John, and I think he comes with a fresh thinking on this\. Not that Tim was unwilling, but I think he knew what works, and he was not willing to stray too far from what was reliable\. And John may just think that, I know we can pull this off\. And we’ll go for a different way\. Who knows? — *This was one of the questions asked by the participants in Asymco’s[May 2026 Office Hours live Q&A](https://asymco.com/2026/05/02/office-hours-apple-fiscal-second-quarter-2026-review-the-presentation/)session, open to[Asymco One](https://asymco.com/one/sub)subscribers\.*