Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination
Summary
This paper investigates how AI agents can learn explicit social norms from human behavior to improve coordination in dynamic interactions, using pedestrian-vehicle scenarios as a testbed. The proposed norm-informed LLM outperforms baselines and human-human interactions by a significant margin.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/09/26, 07:55 AM
# Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07021](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07021) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.07021) > Abstract:Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard\-to\-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents\. As AI agents, including large language models \(LLMs\), become embedded in daily life, they increasingly participate in such interactions and reshape social interaction structures\. Yet they often fail to coordinate with humans in an effective, considerate, and natural manner\. We hypothesize that this gap arises because existing approaches align model behavior with human demonstrations without explicitly quantifying the underlying norms that generate such behavior\. We selected pedestrian\-vehicle interaction as a representative dynamic interaction and developed a simplified experimental platform that captures its key interactive features\. From 3,456 dynamic human interactions collected via this platform, we identified three principles underlying human social norms: outcome predictability, value alignment, and advantage awareness\. Incorporating these principles into AI agents significantly improves human\-AI coordination\. In the closed\-loop interaction task with humans, the social\-norm\-informed LLM achieved a nearly fourfold higher total score than the baseline strategy and outperformed human\-human interactions by 43%\. These findings indicate that formalizing tacit social norms into explicit, quantifiable principles can enable AI agents to achieve mutually beneficial coordination in dynamic interactions, supporting their more natural integration into human society\. ## Submission history From: Yi Yang \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/96e94c86/2607.07021)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 8 Jul 2026 05:39:08 UTC \(2,427 KB\)
Similar Articles
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving Under Pedestrian Behavioral Uncertainty
This paper proposes a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that co-trains an autonomous vehicle and pedestrians with personality-driven jaywalking behavior, achieving a 30% reduction in collisions compared to single-agent approaches and demonstrating more realistic interaction scenarios.
Norm Enforcement for AI Agents: Robustly Shaping Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems
This paper studies norm enforcement mechanisms to shape behavior of language model agents in multi-agent systems. The authors propose robust mechanisms that estimate agent reliability over time and apply escalating penalties to resist exploitation.
NormAct: A Benchmark for Hidden Social Norm Compliance in Embodied Planning
NormAct is a benchmark that evaluates embodied planning agents on hidden social norm compliance, revealing that state-of-the-art MLLMs achieve 67.3% goal achievement but only 26.4% norm compliance, and proposes NormPerceptor to improve task success from 24.2% to 46.7%.
Reading the Room: Foundations, Design, and Challenges of Normative Competence in LLMs
This paper introduces 'normative competence'—the ability of LLM agents to discern community-enforced norms from interaction alone—and evaluates it via a multi-agent debate setting with synthetic norms. Baseline LLMs fail to learn norms even when beneficial, and norm-following shows poor generalizability, with agents exhibiting unselective attribution by copying idiosyncratic noise alongside true norms.
AI agents reshape consensus formation in human groups
This research investigates how LLM agents influence consensus formation in mixed human-AI groups, identifying three regimes where agent proportions alter convergence strength and the semantic nature of consensus.