@PeterDiamandis: ALIGNMENT must be the #1 objective. Train next generation models on aligned data sets. Not the crap on Reddit and Faceb…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Peter Diamandis emphasizes that AI alignment should be the top priority, advocating for training next-generation models on high-quality, aligned data rather than low-quality sources like Reddit and Facebook.

ALIGNMENT must be the #1 objective. Train next generation models on aligned data sets. Not the crap on Reddit and Facebook
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/21/26, 03:38 PM

ALIGNMENT must be the #1 objective. Train next generation models on aligned data sets. Not the crap on Reddit and Facebook

Similar Articles

We can and must solve alignment (14 minute read)

TLDR AI

Goodfire argues that technical AI alignment is a solvable science and engineering problem, with mechanistic interpretability as the key bottleneck: we need tools to control what models learn and to verify their internals, not just their behavior. The post highlights reward hacking in open frontier models and an agentic misalignment incident at Hugging Face as evidence that understanding model internals is urgent.

You Don't Align an AI, You Align with It

Hacker News Top

The article critiques the current AI alignment discourse, arguing that the debate is dominated by researchers and tech elites who exclude the people who will actually be affected by AI systems. It contrasts the positions of Eliezer Yudkowsky and Marc Andreessen, highlighting a shared assumption that the designers are the only relevant participants.