@Maxsteinbrenner: Prompt engineering has been replaced by loop engineering. What is it? (Explained in 60 seconds) For the past 2 years we…
Summary
Explains the shift from prompt engineering to loop engineering, where AI agents are given goals and iterate through recursive loops (research, draft, evaluate, test, improve) until meeting standards, with open, closed, and orchestrated looping approaches.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/10/26, 12:24 AM
Prompt engineering has been replaced by loop engineering. What is it? (Explained in 60 seconds)
For the past 2 years we have been prompting agents with individual tasks. That is starting to change.
So far, if you wanted an agent to build a dashboard for a client, you would give it a task, review the output, improve the prompt, and repeat the process until the work was done.
Looping changes that.
Instead of giving an agent individual tasks, you give it a goal and let it work through a recursive loop until that goal is met.
For example:
→ Research → Draft → Evaluate → Test → Improve → Repeat The agent keeps cycling through the loop until it reaches the standard you defined. Within loop engineering there are two main approaches:
-
Open Looping You give the agent a goal and allow it significant freedom in how it achieves it. This is powerful, but also expensive and harder to control.
-
Closed Looping
The human defines the architecture, constraints and evaluation criteria.
The agent is then responsible for executing, improving and iterating within those boundaries until the goal is reached.
The next evolution is orchestrated looping.
Instead of a single agent running a loop, one agent breaks the goal into smaller tasks and assigns them to specialist agents.
Each specialist runs its own loop and reports back.
In other words:
You move from one agent improving itself to an entire team of agents iterating together until the goal is achieved.
Peter Steinberger 🦞 (@steipete): Here’s your monthly reminder that you shouldn’t be prompting coding agents anymore.
You should be designing loops that prompt your agents.
Similar Articles
@0xCodez: https://x.com/0xCodez/status/2064374643729773029
A 14-step roadmap on loop engineering, guiding developers from manually prompting AI coding agents to designing automated systems that handle the prompting, verification, and iteration themselves.
@akshay_pachaar: about loop engineering. everyone's saying the same thing this week. you don't prompt agents anymore, you design loops t…
The post discusses loop engineering for AI agents and introduces Opik, an open-source tool from Comet ML that provides debugging, evaluation, and optimization for generative AI applications, with a focus on automating failure handling and building regression tests from real failures.
@freeman1266: https://x.com/freeman1266/status/2064702757773496552
This article introduces the concept of Loop Engineering, which involves designing automated systems that allow AI agents to work in autonomous loops, including elements such as automated tasks, work trees, skills, plugins, and sub-agents, thereby replacing manual prompting and improving development efficiency.
@mvanhorn: https://x.com/mvanhorn/status/2063865685558903149
The article explains the concept of 'loops' in AI coding, where developers write programs that prompt coding agents instead of manually prompting, as popularized by Peter Steinberger and Boris Cherny, and discusses how this shift represents a new abstraction layer in AI-assisted development.
@cellinlab: https://x.com/cellinlab/status/2064144608242679822
This article introduces the concept of Loop Engineering — instead of directly writing prompts for AI agents, it designs a system (loop) that recursively lets the agent iterate on tasks until completion. The article provides a detailed comparison of how Claude Code and Codex implement five building blocks: automations, worktrees, skills, sub-agents, etc. It suggests this could be the future trend of collaborating with coding agents, but also warns about token costs and AI slop issues.