Choosing a Mac Mini for local LLMs — what would YOU actually buy?
Summary
A community discussion post seeking advice on which Mac Mini configuration (M4, M2 Pro, or M1 Max) to purchase for running local LLMs with Ollama and coding assistants, with the decision complicated by rumored M5 releases and current supply shortages.
Similar Articles
@Michaelzsguo: Two days ago, I asked whether I should buy a Mac Studio for local LLMs. I was genuinely humbled by how much great feedb…
The author shares a synthesized buying guide for hardware suitable for running local LLMs, comparing Mac Studio, NVIDIA, and AMD options based on community feedback.
Which computer should I buy: Mac or custom-built 5090? [D]
A user seeks advice on whether to purchase a Mac (M5) or custom-built RTX 5090 for machine learning projects involving fine-tuning, custom pipelines, and image/video-heavy workflows, with curiosity about Apple's MLX framework as an alternative to NVIDIA CUDA.
Macs for Local LLM and Openclaw - What I wish I had known.....
A user shares their experience running local LLMs on Mac, noting that prompt processing is slow for AI agents compared to Nvidia GPUs, and recommends cloud models like Deepseek unless privacy is a concern.
@jun_song: Best mid-range local LLM hardware : DGX Spark vs Mac Studio M5 Max 128GB (upcoming) Price: $4.7k (cheaper if used or OE…
A comparison of DGX Spark vs Mac Studio M5 Max for running local LLMs, highlighting decode speed, prefill performance, RAM, power consumption, and cost. The Mac wins on decode bandwidth but DGX is faster for prefill and supports batching.
2x 512gb ram M3 Ultra mac studios
A user shares their $25k hardware setup of two 512GB RAM M3 Ultra Mac Studios for running large language models locally, having tested DeepSeek V3 Q8 and GLM 5.1 Q4 via the exo distributed inference backend, while awaiting Kimi 2.6 MLX optimization.