@steipete: Looks like our focus on performance paid off.
Summary
A comparison shows Hermes Agent outperforms OpenClaw in token processing time and code generation using a local Qwen 35B model on a MacBook Pro M5 Max.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/16/26, 09:22 PM
Looks like our focus on performance paid off.
atomicbot.ai (@atomicbot_ai): Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw using Qwen 35B Local Model
We asked agents to scrape GitHub star history for both tools, find what caused the growth spikes, build a live dashboard in the browser.
MacBook Pro M5 Max 64Gb OpenClaw: 203k tokens, 12m 01s - wrote a bash script Hermes: 257k
Similar Articles
@atomicbot_ai: Hermes Agent vs OpenClaw using Qwen 35B Local Model We asked agents to scrape GitHub star history for both tools, find …
A comparison of Hermes Agent and OpenClaw using Qwen 35B local model, where the agents scrape GitHub star history, identify growth spikes, and build live dashboards. OpenClaw took 12m 01s (203k tokens), Hermes took 33m 01s (257k tokens), with different approaches.
@svpino: Last time I asked here, most people preferred Hermes over OpenClaw. Since then, almost every person I know migrated to …
Santiago Pino notes that most people now prefer the Hermes AI agent over OpenClaw, citing a report where Hermes caught a critical security issue that OpenClaw missed, despite higher token costs.
Hermes vs openclaw: 5 real differences that change which one you should pick
This article compares Hermes and Openclaw AI agents across five key dimensions: self-improvement, community skills, multi-channel support, memory architecture, and framework portability on Clawdi. It concludes that the choice depends on whether users prioritize long-term personalization or immediate multi-channel automation coverage.
Jetson Orin NX Build for Hermes Agent + Benchmarking
A detailed build and benchmarking of a Jetson Orin NX system for running Hermes Agent, achieving 14.65 tok/s at 8k context and 10.21 tok/s at 60k context with Gemma 4 26B quantized model.
@Freerunnering: This actually makes Gemma 4 26B-4A usable for a coding agent @ 72tk/s on my MacBook Pro M1 Max. This video is realtime,…
Unsloth AI announces that Gemma 4 runs 2x faster with MTP GGUFs, making it feasible for local coding agents on hardware like a MacBook Pro M1 Max at 72 tokens/s.