Biomedical Machine Translation for Low-Resource Arabic-Script Languages via Cross-Lingual Transfer and LoRA Adapter Merging

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

This paper presents a systematic study of cross-lingual transfer for biomedical machine translation into low-resource Arabic-script languages, using Arabic and Persian as pivots. The authors evaluate LoRA adapter merging as a zero-data transfer strategy, showing it works surprisingly well for closely related languages like Dari.

arXiv:2607.22300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a systematic study of healthcare-domain cross-lingual transfer to address the scarcity of biomedical NMT resources for Arabic-script languages. We use Arabic and Persian as higher-resource pivots to improve translation for \textbf{four severely low-resource} targets: Dari (Afghan Persian, a standardised variety of Persian), Pashto, Sorani Kurdish (Central Kurdish, a major standardized variety of Kurdish), and Urdu (closely related to Hindi). Using LoRA fine-tuning on small decoder-only LLMs, we train \textit{domain-specific pivot adapters} and evaluate \textbf{three transfer strategies}: few-shot in-context learning, minimal supervised adaptation, and, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time in this setting, zero-data LoRA adapter merging. Supervised adaptation with just 500 sentences achieves near pivot-language quality for Dari (CHrF++ 41.01) and meaningful gains for Urdu (28.88), while adapter merging reaches within 3.5 CHrF++ of supervised adaptation for Dari at zero additional cost. Pashto and Sorani Kurdish remain insufficient for high-stakes clinical deployment exposing the limits of cross-lingual transfer when structural distance from the pivots is too great. LoRA adapter merging works surprisingly well for closely related languages, even without target-language biomedical data.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/27/26, 07:40 AM

# Biomedical Machine Translation for Low-Resource Arabic-Script Languages via Cross-Lingual Transfer and LoRA Adapter Merging
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22300](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22300)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.22300)

> Abstract:We present a systematic study of healthcare\-domain cross\-lingual transfer to address the scarcity of biomedical NMT resources for Arabic\-script languages\. We use Arabic and Persian as higher\-resource pivots to improve translation for \\textbf\{four severely low\-resource\} targets: Dari \(Afghan Persian, a standardised variety of Persian\), Pashto, Sorani Kurdish \(Central Kurdish, a major standardized variety of Kurdish\), and Urdu \(closely related to Hindi\)\. Using LoRA fine\-tuning on small decoder\-only LLMs, we train \\textit\{domain\-specific pivot adapters\} and evaluate \\textbf\{three transfer strategies\}: few\-shot in\-context learning, minimal supervised adaptation, and, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time in this setting, zero\-data LoRA adapter merging\. Supervised adaptation with just 500 sentences achieves near pivot\-language quality for Dari \(CHrF\+\+ 41\.01\) and meaningful gains for Urdu \(28\.88\), while adapter merging reaches within 3\.5 CHrF\+\+ of supervised adaptation for Dari at zero additional cost\. Pashto and Sorani Kurdish remain insufficient for high\-stakes clinical deployment exposing the limits of cross\-lingual transfer when structural distance from the pivots is too great\. LoRA adapter merging works surprisingly well for closely related languages, even without target\-language biomedical data\.

## Submission history

From: Lifeng Han Dr \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/24a5de31/2607.22300)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:44:50 UTC \(89 KB\)

Similar Articles

Cross-Lingual Transfer for Machine Translation in Turkic Languages

arXiv cs.CL

This paper studies cross-lingual transfer for machine translation among five Turkic languages using pairwise transfer matrices with mT5, finding that transfer is strongest between closely related pairs and that Latinization helps in script-mismatched settings.