@ZeroZ_JQ: https://x.com/ZeroZ_JQ/status/2095405548195938767
Summary
The article uses tissue as a metaphor to argue that as the cost of large models decreases, AI usage will shift from reuse to consumption, Agents and software may become disposable consumables, and real feedback and verification will become scarce.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/04/26, 04:21 AM
The Tissue Moment for Large Language Models
People used to blow their noses with handkerchiefs.
A handkerchief could last for years—washed when dirty, dried, and reused.
Then tissues arrived.
What truly changed people wasn’t that tissues were far superior to handkerchiefs, but that their cost dropped to a critical point:
Blow once, toss it away.
No one would wash a tissue, hang it to dry, and use it again the next day.
Because when something becomes cheap enough, people don’t just “use a little more”—they fundamentally change how they use it.
I think large language models are approaching their own such moment.
I call it:
The Tissue Moment for Large Language Models.
Today’s AI Is Still a Handkerchief
Despite talk of Tokens becoming cheaper, we’re still quite frugal with how we use large language models.
We compress Prompts.
Cache Contexts.
Reduce model calls.
Hope an Agent gets things right in one go.
Even our current vision of Agents resembles hiring a long-term employee:
Give it memory, skills, and let it accumulate experience for repeated use.
Because intelligence today still has costs.
Not just money, but time.
One Agent thinking for 30 seconds is fine.
100 Agents thinking for 30 seconds each starts to feel extravagant.
But what if one day, Tokens become fast and cheap enough?
We’ll Start “Wasting Intelligence”
Then, a task might no longer go to a single Agent.
Instead, we might directly generate 100.
10 to research the problem.
20 to propose solutions.
30 to execute directly.
20 to specifically find flaws.
The rest to validate and vote.
Finally, one answer remains.
The other 99 Agents?
Discarded.
This sounds wasteful.
But when tissues first appeared, “blow once and discard” probably seemed wasteful too.
The real change lies here:
When the marginal cost of intelligence is low enough, humans will shift from “reusing intelligence” to “consuming intelligence.”
The true productivity leap in the AI era may not be AI finally making no mistakes.
Instead:
We can finally afford to let AI make mistakes at scale.
An Agent fails once? Try again.
99 out of 100 proposals are wrong? No problem.
If failure is cheap enough, trial and error itself becomes industrialized.
Agents Might Not Be Employees—They’re Consumables
I’m increasingly skeptical of the popular saying:
Agents will become digital employees.
Maybe some will.
But many others may be more like disposable consumables.
For example, researching a company.
The system temporarily generates a financial Agent, an industry Agent, a bearish Agent, a bullish Agent, and a validation Agent.
Task complete—all destroyed.
Next time, regenerate from scratch.
They don’t even need names, long-term memory, or “growth.”
Born for the task.
Receive the context.
Complete the task.
Destroyed.
Very much like ephemeral instances in cloud computing.
One Step Further: Software Could Become Tissues Too
Why was software reused in the past?
Because it was expensive.
No one would develop an entire app just to process one Excel sheet.
So for decades, software logic has been:
Build once, use many times.
Develop once, serve as many users as possible.
But what if generating software itself becomes cheap enough?
You receive an Excel sheet.
AI generates a small, custom app just for that sheet—for filtering, charts, anomaly analysis, and export—tailored to this single task.
You use it for 20 minutes.
Close it.
That software never appears again.
Next sheet, generate a new one.
This becomes:
Generate once, use once.
Software shifts from asset to consumable.
Agents shift from employees to disposable labor.
Reasoning shifts from a scarce resource to a wasted resource.
Truly Scarce Things Will Also Change
Of course, cheap Tokens don’t mean everything is free.
Models may generate 100 proposals in a second, but who tells them which is correct?
Code still needs to run.
Experiments still need to be conducted.
Users still need to pay.
Robots still need to move in the real world.
So as “thinking” becomes cheaper, what’s truly expensive may become:
Feedback and validation.
Once models are abundant in ideas, the scarcest resources become:
Real environments.
Real data.
Real users.
Real execution outcomes.
And a mechanism to judge “what’s actually correct.”
So the strongest Agents of the future might not just be the smartest models.
But the systems best at:
Generate → Execute → Validate → Discard → Regenerate.
Today we still seriously discuss:
Whether a Prompt can be reused.
How much more we can trim the Context.
Why this task called the model 200 times.
But perhaps years from now, we’ll look back and think it’s a bit like:
A person standing in a supermarket, seriously studying whether a tissue used to blow their nose can be washed, dried, and reused the next day.
When technology truly changes the world, it’s rarely because something becomes 10% cheaper.
It’s when it becomes cheap enough that:
We suddenly become willing to waste it.
Handkerchiefs didn’t disappear because tissues appeared.
Long-term software won’t disappear.
Long-term Agents won’t disappear.
But another world might be emerging:
Disposable Tokens.
Disposable Agents.
Disposable software.
Disposable intelligent labor.
Use and discard.
This might be the true tissue moment for large language models.
Similar Articles
@wangyuanzju: https://x.com/wangyuanzju/status/2056573165623713993
Based on observations from the SaaStr conference, the article deeply analyzes how AI Agents will become the main user entry point, existing software will evolve into "headless" services and integrate into the Agent supply chain, ushering in the era of software industrialization. It also discusses how low-friction micropayments will promote deep deconstruction of the commercial software supply chain, presenting historic opportunities for entrepreneurs.
@ba_niu80557: https://x.com/ba_niu80557/status/2068751230667755859
The article explores how increasingly powerful AI models eliminate those whose skills can be encoded into prompts, emphasizing that the truly irreplaceable value lies in tacit knowledge, physical-world operations, and interpersonal trust. Through the example of a friend transitioning from a consultant to a hardware integrator, the author illustrates how proactively yielding to AI-replaceable tasks while deepening expertise in areas beyond AI's reach is key to surviving and thriving in the technological wave.
@AYi_AInotes: A counter-intuitive judgment: 80% of Agent production crashes have nothing to do with model IQ — they're all from context overflow, tool misconfiguration, sub-agent runaway. The real watershed in 2026 is Harness and Loop, not the model. Bro, @wizardly_ai's engineering note...
This article points out that 80% of AI Agent production crashes are not due to model intelligence, but are caused by context overflow, tool misconfiguration, and sub-agent runaway. The author emphasizes that the watershed in 2026 lies in Harness (office systems, security) and Loop (automatic cycling mechanism), not the model itself.
@Xudong07452910: This paper makes me feel that our discussion about "AI will replace programmers" might be completely misguided. The core point: The emergence of AI Agents is not about making software engineers more efficient, but about making the very act of "permanently encoding decision logic into software" increasingly unnecessary. The author describes a more fundamental paradigm shift: tra...
This paper argues that the emergence of AI Agents is not about making programmers more efficient, but fundamentally changes the nature of the software paradigm — code transforms from static artifacts that permanently solidify decision logic into temporary tools dynamically generated by LLMs and discarded after use; the core of software engineering will shift towards designing reliable inference constraint boundaries.
@ba_niu80557: https://x.com/ba_niu80557/status/2071277244287426980
The article deeply analyzes the internal changes Anthropic faces as AI-generated code becomes extremely efficient: the bottleneck shifts from 'writing' to 'verification', traditional management, long-term planning, and effort measurement become ineffective, attention becomes the new scarce resource, and engineers even feel lonely. These phenomena foreshadow the challenges other companies may face in the future.