Our views on AI policy and political advocacy

OpenAI Blog News

Summary

OpenAI outlines its stance on AI policy and political advocacy, stating it has no super PAC donations or employee-funded PAC, and emphasizes transparency and public accountability in shaping AI governance.

Our approach to AI policy and political advocacy, transparency, support for thoughtful regulation and AI safety, and that no outside political group speaks on the company’s behalf.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/02/26, 01:09 AM

# Our views on AI policy and political advocacy Source: [https://openai.com/index/our-views-on-ai-policy-and-political-advocacy/](https://openai.com/index/our-views-on-ai-policy-and-political-advocacy/) OpenAIAI is going to be one of the most powerful technologies people have ever built\. The decisions being made now about how it is governed and deployed will matter for a long time\. We believe that the future of AI should be shaped by governments, researchers, workers, civil society, independent experts, and the public – not any one company or organization\. At the same time, companies like us that are building this technology have a responsibility to be clear about our values, our policy positions, and how we’re advocating for them\. Over the past year, AI policy has become a more prominent part of political debate, with a growing ecosystem of outside groups working to shape it\. Many tech companies have started their own employee\-funded Political Action Committees \(PACs\) or fund existing PACs to shape the public narrative around AI\. OpenAI has not\. We have not made donations to any super PACs, and we do not have an employee\-funded PAC\. We also haven’t made any donations to political candidates or campaigns\. If our approach changes in the future we will be transparent about it\. Our employees are free to participate in the political process in their personal capacities, including by donating or providing advice to candidates, campaigns, and political organizations\. When they do that, they speak for themselves and not OpenAI\. But we recognize that this can raise questions about what OpenAI believes, and we want to be clear that these are separate activities\. In particular, there have been questions around Leading the Future \(LTF\), which has received support from our President and co\-founder, Greg Brockman, and his wife Anna\. As they’ve stated before, any engagement with that organization has been in a personal capacity, not on behalf of the company\. OpenAI does not direct the activities of LTF, or have visibility into their operations\. **We want to be explicit: No outside political group speaks for OpenAI or represents our company’s views\.** OpenAI’s policy views should be judged by what we say and do publicly, and we should be held to a high standard\. We believe AI policy is too consequential to be treated as just another front in partisan politics\. Groups that are advocating on AI should be clear about their policy views, be honest about whom they represent, and not use tactics like astroturfing that obscure the real choices facing policymakers and the public\. We support thoughtful regulation, rigorous testing of powerful AI systems, strong safety standards, public accountability, and broad access to AI’s benefits\. We will keep making that case directly, transparently, and in our own name\. - [2026](https://openai.com/news/?tags=2026) - [Global Affairs](https://openai.com/news/?tags=global-affairs)

Similar Articles

OpenAI public policy agenda

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI publishes its public policy agenda, outlining principles and priorities for AI governance, safety, and democratization, emphasizing collaboration with governments.

OpenAI’s proposals for the U.S. AI Action Plan

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI proposes a comprehensive U.S. AI policy framework to the federal government, focusing on innovation freedom, strategic export controls, copyright reform, infrastructure investment, and government AI adoption to maintain American competitiveness against the PRC.

Anthropic and OpenAI take their beef to the midterm elections

The Verge

The article reports on the growing political rivalry between AI companies, as Democratic candidate Alex Bores challenges the OpenAI-backed super PAC Leading the Future to a debate, highlighting how AI super PACs are becoming distinct political entities.

Statement on OpenAI’s Nonprofit and PBC

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI announces its nonprofit will retain control while gaining an equity stake exceeding $100 billion in a new Public Benefit Corporation (PBC), and launches a $50 million grant initiative to support AI literacy and community innovation. The restructuring aims to ensure the nonprofit benefits financially as OpenAI grows, while maintaining its mission of ensuring AGI benefits all of humanity.

How should AI systems behave, and who should decide?

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI outlines its approach to AI system behavior through three pillars: improving default behavior, allowing user customization within societal bounds, and incorporating public input on defaults and hard limits. The company emphasizes avoiding concentration of power and plans to pilot broader public consultation on system behavior and deployment policies.