Our views on AI policy and political advocacy
Summary
OpenAI outlines its stance on AI policy and political advocacy, stating it has no super PAC donations or employee-funded PAC, and emphasizes transparency and public accountability in shaping AI governance.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/02/26, 01:09 AM
Similar Articles
OpenAI public policy agenda
OpenAI publishes its public policy agenda, outlining principles and priorities for AI governance, safety, and democratization, emphasizing collaboration with governments.
OpenAI’s proposals for the U.S. AI Action Plan
OpenAI proposes a comprehensive U.S. AI policy framework to the federal government, focusing on innovation freedom, strategic export controls, copyright reform, infrastructure investment, and government AI adoption to maintain American competitiveness against the PRC.
Anthropic and OpenAI take their beef to the midterm elections
The article reports on the growing political rivalry between AI companies, as Democratic candidate Alex Bores challenges the OpenAI-backed super PAC Leading the Future to a debate, highlighting how AI super PACs are becoming distinct political entities.
Statement on OpenAI’s Nonprofit and PBC
OpenAI announces its nonprofit will retain control while gaining an equity stake exceeding $100 billion in a new Public Benefit Corporation (PBC), and launches a $50 million grant initiative to support AI literacy and community innovation. The restructuring aims to ensure the nonprofit benefits financially as OpenAI grows, while maintaining its mission of ensuring AGI benefits all of humanity.
How should AI systems behave, and who should decide?
OpenAI outlines its approach to AI system behavior through three pillars: improving default behavior, allowing user customization within societal bounds, and incorporating public input on defaults and hard limits. The company emphasizes avoiding concentration of power and plans to pilot broader public consultation on system behavior and deployment policies.