The US going 100% EV by 2040 would save more than 100k lives, study says

Ars Technica News

Summary

A new study from the International Council on Clean Transportation finds that transitioning the US to 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2040 could prevent over 100,000 premature deaths by reducing harmful air pollutants.

<p>Although climate change is the primary motivation behind electric vehicle adoption, it isn't the only consideration. Removing internal combustion engines from the road directly saves lives by reducing airborne pollutants that can cause and trigger asthma and other lung diseases.</p> <p>Now, <a href="https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ID-611-%E2%80%93-GHS-update_report_final-2.pdf">a report</a> from the International Council on Clean Transportation has tried to quantify that effect, comparing various electrification scenarios over the next couple of decades. Currently, more than 41,800 premature deaths are attributable to air pollution from road transport, the ICCT says.</p> <p>We've long known that living near a busy road is associated with worse health outcomes. Combustion products like nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), particulates (PMs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are all found around highways and busy intersections in concentrations high enough to cause health effects, and studies have repeatedly shown that living close to a major roadway is associated with increased mortality.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/the-us-going-100-ev-by-2040-would-save-more-than-100k-lives-study-says/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/the-us-going-100-ev-by-2040-would-save-more-than-100k-lives-study-says/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/30/26, 06:37 PM

# The US going 100% EV by 2040 would save more than 100k lives, study says Source: [https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/the-us-going-100-ev-by-2040-would-save-more-than-100k-lives-study-says/](https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/06/the-us-going-100-ev-by-2040-would-save-more-than-100k-lives-study-says/) Although climate change is the primary motivation behind electric vehicle adoption, it isn’t the only consideration\. Removing internal combustion engines from the road directly saves lives by reducing airborne pollutants that can cause and trigger asthma and other lung diseases\. Now,[a report](https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ID-611-%E2%80%93-GHS-update_report_final-2.pdf)from the International Council on Clean Transportation has tried to quantify that effect, comparing various electrification scenarios over the next couple of decades\. Currently, more than 41,800 premature deaths are attributable to air pollution from road transport, the ICCT says\. We’ve long known that living near a busy road is associated with worse health outcomes\. Combustion products like nitrogen oxides \(NOx\), carbon monoxide \(CO\), particulates \(PMs\), and volatile organic compounds \(VOCs\) are all found around highways and busy intersections in concentrations high enough to cause health effects, and studies have repeatedly shown that living close to a major roadway is associated with increased mortality\. The ICCT worked with the FIA Foundation—yes, the road safety nonprofit is related to the same FIA that’s in charge of F1 and other global motorsport—to create a model to estimate road transport emissions through to 2050\. The model included light\-duty vehicles \(passenger cars and trucks\), heavy\-duty vehicles \(delivery trucks, buses, tractor\-trailers, etc\), and two\- and three\-wheel vehicles\. It predicted levels of NOx, black carbon and organic carbon, sulfur oxides, ammonia, CO, and VOCs\. The study then calculated the heart impacts from conditions like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \(COPD\), diabetes, ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, and stroke \(all linked to PM2\.5 exposure and ozone exposure\), as well as pediatric asthma incidence caused by NOx and NOx\-attributable premature mortality in adults\. Several scenarios were then run\. The primary reference scenario uses August 2025 as the baseline, with a US government that’s openly hostile to the idea of clean energy\. Another scenario considers what would happen if there is an ambitious effort to adopt EVs, assuming that 100 percent of all vehicles are zero\-emissions by 2045, with some regions going all\-EV for light vehicles by 2035 and for heavy vehicles by 2040\.

Similar Articles

EV drivers will pay $130 a year under Congress' 2026 transportation bill

Ars Technica

Congress' 2026 transportation bill includes a $130 annual federal registration fee for electric vehicles, drawing criticism from advocates who say it unfairly penalizes EV drivers at a time when gas prices are high and federal clean-vehicle incentives have been eliminated.

After Struggling With EVs, US Automakers Pivot to Energy

Wired

US automakers like Ford and GM are pivoting from struggling EV programs to battery energy storage systems, repurposing plants and forming partnerships to supply utilities and data centers, with Ford's new Ford Energy subsidiary driving a 13% stock surge.

@elonmusk: True

X AI KOLs Timeline

Elon Musk highlights that Tesla's Full Self-Driving technology could save lives, as car crashes are the leading cause of death for healthy people aged 5-29 globally, with Tesla having collected over 10 billion miles of data.