any one else finds Mimo v2.5 better than deepseek v4 flash!?
Summary
A user reports that Mimo v2.5 outperforms DeepSeek v4 Flash in coding tasks based on benchmarks like Codex, Oh My Pi, Hermes, and Terminal Bench v2.0, though both models are similar overall.
Similar Articles
We Tested DeepSeek V4 Pro and Flash Against Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.6 (11 minute read)
DeepSeek released V4 Pro and V4 Flash under MIT license on April 24, 2026. In benchmarks against Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.6, V4 Pro scored 77/100 at $2.25, placing between Opus 4.7 (91) and Kimi K2.6 (68), while V4 Flash scored 60/100 at $0.02, the cheapest in the comparison, with a 75% discount on V4 Pro through May 31.
Big Model Value Wars - DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M3
A discussion comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and MiniMax M3 for best value in local or openrouter use, with a focus on agentic and coding tasks, and mentions of Hermes Agent and Qwen 3.6 variants.
How good is DeepSeek-V4 Flash, actually?
An evaluation of the performance and capabilities of DeepSeek-V4 Flash, assessing its real-world effectiveness.
Why is no one talking about Mimo V2.5 (non-pro)
Mimo V2.5 offers performance comparable to Claude Opus 4.5 at a fraction of the cost, making it a highly cost-effective AI model for agentic tasks.
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeepSeek releases DeepSeek-V4-Flash and DeepSeek-V4-Pro, new MoE language models supporting 1 million token contexts with improved efficiency and performance.