Big Model Value Wars - DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M3
Summary
A discussion comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and MiniMax M3 for best value in local or openrouter use, with a focus on agentic and coding tasks, and mentions of Hermes Agent and Qwen 3.6 variants.
Similar Articles
@cyrilXBT: Nemotron 3 Ultra versus DeepSeek V4 versus MiniMax M3 versus Qwen 3.7 Max. Same two prompts. Four frontier models. One …
A comparison of four frontier AI models (Nemotron 3 Ultra, DeepSeek V4, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Max) on the same two prompts, with full results linked.
Price wars begin. MiMo 2.5 Pro now costs the same as DeepSeek V4 Pro
MiMo 2.5 Pro has lowered its price to match DeepSeek V4 Pro, sparking a price war among AI model providers.
any one else finds Mimo v2.5 better than deepseek v4 flash!?
A user reports that Mimo v2.5 outperforms DeepSeek v4 Flash in coding tasks based on benchmarks like Codex, Oh My Pi, Hermes, and Terminal Bench v2.0, though both models are similar overall.
MiroThinker-1.7, an open-weight deep research agent (Qwen3 MoE base) — mini is 30B/3B active, curious what tok/s people get on consumer hardware
MiroThinker-1.7 is an open-weight deep research agent built on Qwen3 MoE, with a mini version (30B total, 3B active) designed for consumer hardware; the team shares benchmarks and seeks feedback on local deployment.
after a month with 5 Chinese coding LLMs, is M3 actually going to take the top spot?
A user shares a month-long comparison of five Chinese coding LLMs (Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1, MiMo V2.5 Pro, MiniMax 2.7, DeepSeek V4 Pro) on a TypeScript/Next.js codebase, rating each in categories like frontend, backend, code review, all-rounder, and reasoning. They note MiniMax 2.7 achieves ~90% of Opus 4.6 quality at ~7% cost and speculate whether the upcoming MiniMax 3.0 will close gaps in planning and test coverage to become the top spot.