Big Model Value Wars - DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M3
Summary
A discussion comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and MiniMax M3 for best value in local or openrouter use, with a focus on agentic and coding tasks, and mentions of Hermes Agent and Qwen 3.6 variants.
Similar Articles
@cyrilXBT: Nemotron 3 Ultra versus DeepSeek V4 versus MiniMax M3 versus Qwen 3.7 Max. Same two prompts. Four frontier models. One …
A comparison of four frontier AI models (Nemotron 3 Ultra, DeepSeek V4, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Max) on the same two prompts, with full results linked.
I switched my personal agent from DeepSeek V4.1 Flash to MiMo V2.6 Pro
Xiaomi released open-weight MiMo V2.6 Pro and Flash models. The author switched their personal agent from DeepSeek V4.1 Flash to MiMo V2.6 Pro, finding lower costs and comparable or better results in testing.
Price wars begin. MiMo 2.5 Pro now costs the same as DeepSeek V4 Pro
MiMo 2.5 Pro has lowered its price to match DeepSeek V4 Pro, sparking a price war among AI model providers.
MiMo-v2.6-Pro: Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis
An analysis of the MiMo-v2.6-Pro AI model's intelligence, performance, and price using Artificial Analysis's benchmarks and indexes.
any one else finds Mimo v2.5 better than deepseek v4 flash!?
A user reports that Mimo v2.5 outperforms DeepSeek v4 Flash in coding tasks based on benchmarks like Codex, Oh My Pi, Hermes, and Terminal Bench v2.0, though both models are similar overall.