Cross-Disciplinary Taxonomy and Modeling of Misunderstanding Generation, Amplification, and Detection, from Pragmatics to AI Agents
Summary
This paper presents a cross-disciplinary taxonomy and modeling framework for understanding, amplifying, and detecting misunderstandings, bridging pragmatics and AI agent systems.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/17/26, 09:40 AM
# Cross-Disciplinary Taxonomy and Modeling of Misunderstanding Generation, Amplification, and Detection, from Pragmatics to AI Agents Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13604](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13604) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
MMMMM: A Unified Taxonomy for Investigating the Mechanisms of Multilingual MultiModal Misinformation
This paper presents a unified taxonomy for investigating multilingual multimodal misinformation on social media, using a large-scale dataset and automated annotation with a Vision-Language Model to uncover insights for detection and mitigation.
The Misattribution Gap: When Memory Poisoning Looks Like Model Failure in Agentic AI Systems
This paper identifies a structural failure in multi-agent AI pipelines where memory-layer attacks can be misattributed as model misalignment, formalizing Semantic Norm Drift (SND) and proposing Counterfactual Composition Testing and Memory-Persistent Information-Flow Control as defenses.
Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
This paper proposes an adversarial social epistemology framework for analyzing trust, deception, and inference chains in communicative landscapes involving humans and large language models, and outlines mechanisms for auditing trust breaches.
A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
This paper introduces a tri-agent framework for evaluating and aligning the question clarification capabilities of large language models, using three LLM-based agents to simulate and assess clarification dialogues.
Enhancing Target-Guided Proactive Dialogue Systems via Conversational Scenario Modeling and Intent-Keyword Bridging
This paper proposes a method to enhance target-guided proactive dialogue systems by jointly modeling user profiles and domain knowledge as conversational scenarios and employing intent-keyword bridging to predict future dialogue turns.