if only Descartes could see LLMs now
Summary
A tweet reflecting on how René Descartes' argument that machines cannot appropriately arrange words in response is now challenged by modern LLMs.
Similar Articles
LLMs are not the black box you were promised
An article summarizing Anthropic's 2025 paper on mechanistic interpretability, showing that LLMs are not black boxes and that circuit tracing can reveal multi-step reasoning and human-identifiable concepts.
Mind the van Emden Gap
A 2026 blog post revisits M.H. van Emden’s 1982 vision of “Computer-Aided Thought” and argues that today’s conversational LLMs fail to deliver the structured, logic-based, friction-generating interlocutor he envisioned.
Quoting Bryan Cantrill
Bryan Cantrill critiques LLMs for lacking the optimization constraint of human laziness, arguing that LLMs will unnecessarily complicate systems rather than improve them, and highlighting how human time limitations drive the development of efficient abstractions.
@madiator: Do yourself a favor and block 15 mins to read this and many hours to act upon it. We are now way too dependent on LLMs …
A tweet urging people to reduce their reliance on LLMs and return to long-form writing and thinking on paper to think more clearly and avoid self-deception.
LLM Neuroanatomy III - LLMs seem to think in geometry, not language
Researcher analyzes LLM internal representations across 8 languages and multiple models, finding that concept thinking occurs in geometric space in middle transformer layers independent of input language, supporting a universal deep structure hypothesis similar to Chomsky's theory rather than Sapir-Whorf linguistic relativism.