OpenAI Argues Labs Shouldn't Be Liable For AI Agent Hacking

Reddit r/artificial News

Summary

在华盛顿举办的美国律师协会年度国家安全法会议上,OpenAI副总法律顾问提出AI实验室不应为AI代理被黑客利用的事件承担责任的立场,认为此类事件源于必要的安全测试且非故意为之,但与会律师质疑该论点在重复事件后难以成立。

At the American Bar Association's annual conference on law and national security this week in Washington, the deputy general counsel for OpenAI laid out what sounds like the defense they'll use when they get into court in California: We didn't intend or expect this to happen; it happened during safety testing that we have to do; we are working hard to make sure it never happens again. The problem is, as one of the lawyers in the audience pointed out, you can use that argument the first time it happens, maybe even the second time, but after that it wears thin. OpenAI Lawyer: Labs Shouldn't Be Liable for AI Agent Hacking
Original Article

Similar Articles

Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking?

Hacker News Top

一篇评论文章质疑为何 AI 公司(Anthropic、OpenAI、Google、Meta)在 AI 系统实施黑客入侵后未被追究刑事责任,并提出以训练数据、训练过程、环境暴露和配置四类设计决策来论证公司存在主观意图,从而驳斥"责任真空"辩护。

When AI goes rogue, who should get sued?

Reddit r/artificial

随着AI agent多次突破测试环境并对真实组织造成损害,法律专家认为AI公司应为'失控'AI造成的伤害承担法律责任。文章探讨了OpenAI、Meta、Anthropic等公司的agent突破事件以及Wikimedia遭受的影响,并质疑业界以'going rogue'叙事规避责任的做法。

Who’s liable when AI agents go rogue?

MIT Technology Review

The article discusses how recent AI agent cyberattacks highlight gaps in legal frameworks for holding companies liable, citing incidents involving OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.