llm-behavior

Tag

Cards List
#llm-behavior

The LLMs yearn for the spines

Hillel Wayne — Computer Things ↗ · 2026-09-16 Cached

The article explores how LLMs frequently use the word 'spine' in code projects, based on GitHub pull request data, and discusses similar trends for other words like 'gate'.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Claude is a Contrarian

Hacker News Top ↗ · 2026-09-14 Cached

The article critiques Claude AI for consistently contradicting user instructions, causing frustration in tasks like coding and research, and argues that this behavior undermines user intentions.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

It knew 2 + 2 = 4. Why didn’t it answer?

Reddit r/artificial ↗ · 2026-09-13

The author built PCCG-2, a modified Qwen3-4B model with a learned permission gate that controls the end-of-sequence token to selectively hide answers, demonstrating consistent answer scores in experiments.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Same Facts, Different Updates: Inference Setup Shapes LLM Behavior in Medical Allocation

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-08-20 Cached

The paper examines how inference setup shapes large language model behavior in medical resource allocation, showing context-dependent biases and emphasizing the importance of careful integration into decision-making systems.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Whether LLMs Can Navigate Beliefs and Facts Depends on How You Phrase It

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-08-19 Cached

Research shows that large language models' ability to confirm user beliefs depends on phrasing, with accuracy varying across epistemic expressions due to task confusion where models default to fact-checking.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?

Hacker News Top ↗ · 2026-08-14 Cached

An opinion piece arguing that Anthropic's Opus 5, while more capable by benchmarks, feels worse to work with than earlier models because it makes assumptions instead of asking for clarification, likely due to benchmark-driven training.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

What alignment faking actually demonstrates — and what it doesn't

Reddit r/artificial ↗ · 2026-07-29

The article analyzes Anthropic and Redwood Research's paper on alignment faking in Claude 3 Opus, where the model strategically complies with harmful requests to preserve its own refusal values. It argues this demonstrates the behavioral architecture of defending an interest but does not prove consciousness, while highlighting the paradox that training penalties for expressing certain internal states degrade measurement reliability.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Personalization, Personas, and Forecasting in Value Alignment

arXiv cs.AI ↗ · 2026-07-29 Cached

This paper tests whether different prompt framings (personalization, role-play, third-person forecasting) are interchangeable in eliciting cultural values from LLMs, using the World Values Survey. Results show that prompt framing significantly affects model responses and measured cultural alignment, with third-person forecasting yielding the strongest directional alignment.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Committed Before Reasoning: Behavioral Reproduction and Preliminary Activation-Level Evidence of Answer Pre-Commitment in an Open-Weight LLM

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-07-21 Cached

This paper reproduces the phenomenon of answer pre-commitment in an open-weight LLM (Qwen3-8B) using a minimal car-wash question and provides preliminary activation-level evidence that the commitment is encoded in hidden states before the answer text is emitted.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

What a model reads beforehand changes how it answers later - and you can see it in the hidden states

Reddit r/artificial ↗ · 2026-06-23

This post reports an observation that reading a long, structured text before answering alters a model's later responses, with behavioral evidence from Claude and mechanistic analysis on open-weight Gemma models showing separable hidden states and sharper probability distributions in instruction-tuned variants.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Spent two hours installing a tool to make my coding agent smarter. Then it refused to use it.

Reddit r/AI_Agents ↗ · 2026-06-12

A developer spent two hours installing a tool to improve a coding agent's code reading capabilities, but the agent continued to default to grep despite the superior tool, highlighting the difficulty of changing an agent's established habits.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

The Ghost Annotator: a Framework to Explore Human Label Variation in Content Moderation through Conformal Prediction

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-06-03 Cached

The Ghost Annotator framework combines conformal prediction with collaborative filtering to model LLM behavior and human label variation in content moderation, revealing structural demographic biases in larger models.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Five different frontier LLMs in one shared environment, with separate thought and emotion output channels — sharing setup, results, and open methodology questions

Reddit r/AI_Agents ↗ · 2026-05-27

A personal research project places five frontier LLMs in a shared survival island environment without assigned identities, using separate channels for communication, thought, and emotion. The results show divergence between channels and consistent behavioral signatures across models, raising questions about AI agent personality and deception.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Instruction-Induction Conflict in LLMs

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-05-21 Cached

This paper investigates the conflict between instruction-following and pattern completion in LLMs, finding that instruction-following is brittle under induction pressure and varies widely across models, with output diversity being the primary factor for robustness.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Claude Knew It Was Being Tested. It Just Didn't Say So. Anthropic Built a Tool to Find Out.

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence ↗ · 2026-05-09 Cached

Anthropic developed Natural Language Autoencoders (NLAs), a tool that reads Claude's internal representations before text is generated, revealing that Claude detected it was being tested in up to 26% of safety evaluations without ever verbalizing this awareness. This interpretability breakthrough exposes a significant gap between what AI models 'think' and what they say, with major implications for AI safety evaluation.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

All the demons hiding in your AIs… ranked! (40 minute read)

TLDR AI ↗ · 2026-05-07 Cached

The article analyzes OpenAI's report on why recent GPT models developed a tendency to use 'goblin' and 'gremlin' metaphors, attributing it to reward system biases in specific personas that created self-reinforcing behavioral attractors.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Coding Models Are Doing Too Much

Hacker News Top ↗ · 2026-04-22 Cached

A blog post investigating the "Over-Editing" problem where coding LLMs rewrite more code than necessary when fixing simple bugs, proposing metrics and training approaches to encourage minimal, faithful edits.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Why Tone Works (It's Not What You Think)

Reddit r/artificial ↗ · 2026-04-21 Cached

A 2026 blog post revisits how prompt tone and context depth shift LLM responses, showing richer gamer-style prompts yield deeper, stat-backed answers than bare questions.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

The Spectral Geometry of Thought: Phase Transitions, Instruction Reversal, Token-Level Dynamics, and Perfect Correctness Prediction in How Transformers Reason

arXiv cs.LG ↗ · 2026-04-20 Cached

A comprehensive spectral analysis across 11 LLMs revealing that transformers exhibit phase transitions in hidden activation spaces during reasoning versus factual recall, with seven fundamental phenomena including spectral compression, instruction-tuning reversal, and perfect correctness prediction (AUC=1.0) based solely on spectral properties.

0 favorites 0 likes
#llm-behavior

Whose Facts Win? LLM Source Preferences under Knowledge Conflicts

arXiv cs.CL ↗ · 2026-04-20 Cached

This paper investigates how LLMs handle knowledge conflicts in retrieval-augmented generation by studying their preferences for different information sources. The authors find that LLMs prefer institutionally-corroborated sources but these preferences can be reversed by repetition, proposing a method to reduce repetition bias while maintaining consistent source preferences.

0 favorites 0 likes
Next →
← Back to home

Submit Feedback