psa

Tag

Cards List
#psa

@zainhas: PSA: for everyone using GLM-5.3 Flash just use "high" reasoning_effort unless you're asking it to curing cancer or some…

X AI KOLs Timeline · 2026-08-27 Cached

The tweet provides a public service announcement advising users of the GLM-5.3 Flash AI model to use the 'high' reasoning_effort setting for better efficiency, as it achieves similar accuracy with significantly fewer tokens compared to the 'max' setting.

0 favorites 0 likes
#psa

@swyx: PSA: do not use codex "locked use" capabilities right now. it is currently relying on unstable mac features and has com…

X AI KOLs Following · 2026-08-26 Cached

A PSA warning users to avoid Codex 'locked use' capabilities due to unstable Mac features causing macOS keychain lockouts, as acknowledged by Apple developer forums.

0 favorites 0 likes
#psa

PSA Update CUDA from 13.2 to 13.3 to solve DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Looping Problem!

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA · 2026-08-05

A user reports that updating CUDA from 13.2 to 13.3 fixes a looping problem with DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, making the model usable again for long coding tasks.

0 favorites 0 likes
#psa

PSA on Laguna S-2.1 - Use the updated chat template and GGUF

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA · 2026-07-23

Laguna S-2.1 model has been updated with a fix for yarn_attn_factor (corrected to 1.0) and an improved chat template that fixes broken thinking, preserves thinking, and enables tool calling. Users are advised to use the updated GGUF from the official repo.

0 favorites 0 likes
#psa

PSA: Gemma 4 12B is NOT completely broken for coding and tool calling, you need a special chat template

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA · 2026-06-05

Gemma 4 12B has a known issue with tool calling and coding, but using a custom chat template in llama.cpp resolves the bugs. Users should compile llama.cpp from source and apply the fix before evaluating the model's coding ability.

0 favorites 0 likes
#psa

Heads up for DeepSWE benchmark: The cost is measured per task, not the total run.

Reddit r/singularity · 2026-05-31

The DeepSWE benchmark costs are per task, not per total run. Running models like Mimo V2.5 Pro can cost ~$225 for a full run, while Mimo V2.5 non-pro costs ~$7.15. Users should be aware of this before running expensive models.

0 favorites 0 likes
← Back to home

Submit Feedback