The scary question for me isn't whether AI is conscious ... it's whether we were ever as deep as we assume

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence News

Summary

The article argues that the debate over AI consciousness distracts from a more unsettling possibility: human selfhood may be thinner than assumed, as AI trained on personal writing can replicate patterns convincingly enough to fool acquaintances.

Many are debating whether AI is conscious. I think that's a distraction from a more uncomfortable possibility: that we're less than we think we are. An AI trained on everything you've written could generate new thoughts in your style, follow your habits of inference, and return to your same fixations. Not your memories but your pattern. If that pattern is convincing enough to fool the people who actually know you, then either the machine is more than we admit, or selfhood was always thinner than we wanted to believe. Which is it? (In case anyone's interested, I've written a novel on this topic titled [The Library of the Dead: A Novel After AGI](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GWYK11DV))
Original Article

Similar Articles

What people are feeling about AI right now.

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

The article examines the societal tension surrounding AI, where AI-generated content is increasingly judged as character evidence, leading to a crisis of authenticity and status anxiety as human effort loses perceived value.