关于AI智能体的可审计性声明

arXiv cs.AI 论文

摘要

本文将Auditable Agents框架的策略可检查性维度扩展到关于AI智能体的声明上,定义了何时一条声明是可审计的,并证明独立的记录覆盖、逐操作的授权绑定以及完整性是验证的必要条件,同时为运营方和标准制定者提供了实用的指导。

arXiv:2610.07459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizations make claims about their AI agents: a person approves every external email, every action is logged, an evaluation shows the agent is safe to deploy. Article 12 of the EU AI Act requires high-risk systems to allow the automatic recording of events but does not say which records settle a given claim. The position is one sentence: to be checked, a claim about an agent must first name its policy, its scope, the records that would settle it, and who writes them. Adapting the preconditions of an assurance engagement, we call a claim auditable when these elements and a decision rule are fixed before any verdict and the records are obtainable. This extends the Policy Checkability dimension of our Auditable Agents framework from single actions to claims. Agents add three conditions: coverage by an independent record, authorization bound to each action's arguments, and completeness beyond integrity. Under an explicit model, we prove that support is impossible without each wherever its hypotheses hold. A claim-check table applies the method to six common claims, anchored in current NIST, IETF, and OWASP drafts. A worked case follows one claim through five evidence states. We close with a practice box and steps for operators, buyers, auditors, and standard setters.
查看原文
查看缓存全文

缓存时间: 2026/10/08 12:27

# Auditable Claims about AI Agents
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07459](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07459)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.07459)

> Abstract:Organizations make claims about their AI agents: a person approves every external email, every action is logged, an evaluation shows the agent is safe to deploy\. Article 12 of the EU AI Act requires high\-risk systems to allow the automatic recording of events but does not say which records settle a given claim\. The position is one sentence: to be checked, a claim about an agent must first name its policy, its scope, the records that would settle it, and who writes them\. Adapting the preconditions of an assurance engagement, we call a claim auditable when these elements and a decision rule are fixed before any verdict and the records are obtainable\. This extends the Policy Checkability dimension of our Auditable Agents framework from single actions to claims\. Agents add three conditions: coverage by an independent record, authorization bound to each action's arguments, and completeness beyond integrity\. Under an explicit model, we prove that support is impossible without each wherever its hypotheses hold\. A claim\-check table applies the method to six common claims, anchored in current NIST, IETF, and OWASP drafts\. A worked case follows one claim through five evidence states\. We close with a practice box and steps for operators, buyers, auditors, and standard setters\.

## Submission history

From: Xiyang Hu \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/4966f27e/2610.07459)\] **\[v1\]**Mon, 5 Oct 2026 22:11:11 UTC \(945 KB\)

相似文章

AI 代理执行了操作。一旦出错,谁来负责?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

一篇关于生产环境中 AI 代理行为问责的评论文章,主张提示词不等于权限,通过强制限制、指定决策人、最小化访问权限、安全重试机制和不可篡改的审计记录,才能让代理获得更大的自主权变得可行。