@Miles_Brundage: + contrary to popular belief it is not that hard to spend lots of $, you just need to be willing to take flak for thing…
Summary
Miles Brundage comments on the necessity of willingness to take risks and delegate to scale AI development effectively.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: Still lots of alpha in not being at the top few companies - we need independent takes on this stuff now more than ever
Miles Brundage echoes Nathan Lambert's point about the need for independent voices in AI discussions, particularly regarding regulatory capture and attacks on open-source, highlighting the value of not being tied to major AI companies.
@Miles_Brundage: This sort of thing is why I think the OAI Foundation should be spending at least $10B this year - philanthropic timesca…
Miles Brundage argues that the OAI Foundation should increase its spending to at least $10 billion this year because philanthropic timelines do not align with the rapid pace of AI development.
@Miles_Brundage: We could have this at home, American friends (a government agency that is staffed to do, and allowed to publish, stuff …
Miles Brundage highlights excellent work from the AI Security Institute investigating the impact of test-time compute budgets for frontier AI model evaluations, with praise from Noam Brown.
Every AI prompt costs money — and that changes everything
The article argues that the real challenge in AI isn't just building smarter models but making them cost-efficient at scale, highlighting the importance of reducing token usage, improving speed, and optimizing infrastructure.
Is your AI strategy burning capital or building it?
The article critiques the current AI mania in enterprises, where skyrocketing costs often outweigh ROI due to inefficient usage like token maxing. It advocates for a dual focus on organizational fluency and algorithmic cost mitigation, such as Observation Masking, to transform AI from a capital burner into a value creator.