Do Enterprise Systems Need Learned World Models? The Importance of Context to Infer Dynamics

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper investigates whether enterprise agents need learned world models or can instead rely on runtime discovery of system configurations. It introduces 'enterprise discovery agents' and a benchmark called CascadeBench, demonstrating that reading runtime context yields better robustness against deployment shifts in dynamic enterprise environments.

World models enable agents to anticipate the effects of their actions by internalizing environment dynamics. In enterprise systems, however, these dynamics are often defined by tenant-specific business logic that varies across deployments and evolves over time, making models trained on historical transitions brittle under deployment shift. We ask a question the world-models literature has not addressed: when the rules can be read at inference time, does an agent still need to learn them? We argue, and demonstrate empirically, that in settings where transition dynamics are configurable and readable, runtime discovery complements offline training by grounding predictions in the active system instance. We propose enterprise discovery agents, which recover relevant transition dynamics at runtime by reading the system's configuration rather than relying solely on internalized representations. We introduce CascadeBench, a reasoning-focused benchmark for enterprise cascade prediction that adopts the evaluation methodology of World of Workflows on diverse synthetic environments, and use it together with deployment-shift evaluation to show that offline-trained world models can perform well in-distribution but degrade as dynamics change, whereas discovery-based agents are more robust under shift by grounding their predictions in the current instance. Our findings suggest that, in configurable enterprise environments, agents should not rely solely on fixed internalized dynamics, but should incorporate mechanisms for discovering relevant transition logic at runtime.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/13/26, 04:10 AM

Paper page - Do Enterprise Systems Need Learned World Models? The Importance of Context to Infer Dynamics

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.12178 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

Enterprise discovery agents that read system configuration at runtime outperform traditional world models in configurable environments where dynamics change over time.

World modelsenable agents to anticipate the effects of their actions by internalizing environment dynamics. Inenterprise systems, however, these dynamics are often defined by tenant-specific business logic that varies across deployments and evolves over time, making models trained on historical transitions brittle underdeployment shift. We ask a question the world-models literature has not addressed: when the rules can be read at inference time, does an agent still need to learn them? We argue, and demonstrate empirically, that in settings wheretransition dynamicsare configurable and readable,runtime discoverycomplements offline training by grounding predictions in the active system instance. We proposeenterprise discovery agents, which recover relevanttransition dynamicsat runtime by reading the system’s configuration rather than relying solely on internalized representations. We introduceCascadeBench, a reasoning-focused benchmark for enterprise cascade prediction that adopts the evaluation methodology ofWorld of Workflowson diverse synthetic environments, and use it together with deployment-shift evaluation to show that offline-trainedworld modelscan perform well in-distribution but degrade as dynamics change, whereas discovery-based agents are more robust under shift by grounding their predictions in the current instance. Our findings suggest that, in configurable enterprise environments, agents should not rely solely on fixed internalized dynamics, but should incorporate mechanisms for discovering relevant transition logic at runtime.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605\.12178

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.12178 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.12178 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.12178 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Bigger context windows aren't solving the enterprise memory problem. Here's why

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

This article critiques the trend of ever-larger context windows in LLMs, arguing they don't solve enterprise knowledge problems due to retrieval degradation, data volume, and lack of structure. It advocates for knowledge modeling layers that map relationships and intent before retrieval.

Context Graphs for Proactive Enterprise Agents

arXiv cs.AI

This paper proposes Context Graphs, a live relational data structure for enterprise entities that enables proactive agents to surface relevant information before users query, formalizing components for delta detection, proactivity scoring, and LLM-powered surfacing.

Learning Safe Agent Behaviour from Human Preferences and Justifications via World Models

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces DROPJ, a human-centred method for safely training and deploying agent policies by learning a world model from real-world trajectories, then eliciting human preferences with justifications to train a reward model for model predictive control. Experiments show that using human-generated simulated trajectories and justifications improves safety and reduces computational cost.