@rohanpaul_ai: atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally, ran a very revealing comparison for Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

atomic.chat ran a comparison showing Claude Sonnet 5 matches GPT 5.5 on three physics coding demos at 6x lower cost, using fewer tokens than other models.

atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally, ran a very revealing comparison for Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.5. Claude Sonnet 5 just matched GPT 5.5 on 3 physics coding demos at 6x lower cost. Also spent minimum number of tokens. - Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 - Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 - Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 - GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/01/26, 01:56 AM

atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally, ran a very revealing comparison for Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.5.

Claude Sonnet 5 just matched GPT 5.5 on 3 physics coding demos at 6x lower cost.

Also spent minimum number of tokens.

  • Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15
  • Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58
  • Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39
  • GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94

atomic.chat (@atomic_chat_hq): New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper!

We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos

Prompts:

  • A car crashes into a brick wall
  • A wrecking ball destroys a house
  • A catapult throws a rock at a

Similar Articles