@FuSheng_0306: Sharp Review of Silicon Valley Giants: None Can Compete
Summary
The author sharply reviews the performance of Silicon Valley tech giants in AI, asserting that currently none can truly lead, and analyzes the competitive landscape among companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/17/26, 07:31 AM
A Critical Look at Silicon Valley’s AI Giants: Not a Single One Can Compete
In previous articles, we talked about how Anthropic is racing ahead, OpenAI is fighting back, and Google is lagging behind. Today, let’s take a look at what the rest of Silicon Valley’s tech giants are doing in AI.
Let me start with my conclusion: not a single one can compete.
Two years ago, these big Silicon Valley companies were all ambitious, pouring money in left and right. Looking back now, who can truly lead in AI? Hardly any.
I’ve ranked these five companies in order, and I’ll go through them one by one.
Similar Articles
@FuSheng_0306: In an interview with Yao Shunyu, Google's internal strategy is indeed going all out to catch up. Google had been competing with OpenAI on chatbots, and fortunately, Gemini 3 performed well, increasing its market share. However, the rise of Anthropic made Sergey Brin realize that the decisive battle of large models lies in code-writing ability...
The article discusses Google's internal strategic adjustment in the face of competition from OpenAI and Anthropic. Google saw some success with Gemini 3, but realized the decisive battle of large models is in code-writing ability, reflecting the urgency of catching up.
@dongxi_nlp: A very valuable article, the last 6 takeaways are worth pondering. Among them, the last two: 5. The data industry is far from developed. Anthropic and OpenAI spend over $10 million on a single environment, while Chinese AI labs have a 'build rather than buy' mentality. 6. Countless...
The article summarizes the current state of the AI data industry, pointing out that the data industry is not yet mature. Anthropic and OpenAI spend over $10 million on a single environment, while Chinese AI labs tend to build rather than buy. In addition, many labs have access to Huawei chips but still crave more Nvidia chips.
@HoodyLiu: Highly recommend reading this in-depth Silicon Valley piece: "The Next Biggest Moat in AI" by Foundation Capital Partner and former McKinsey consultant Jaya Gupta. The article offers two perspectives: As a founder, how to create a company that cannot be copied. As an employee, how to identify…
Foundation Capital Partner Jaya Gupta argues that the biggest moat in the AI field is not the technology itself, but the company's organizational structure and personnel composition. The article offers advice for AI founders on building barriers through identity alignment, and guides job seekers on how to identify companies that truly value the long-term worth of their talent.
@jason_chen998: Speaking of companies that got killed by AI, we have to mention Zuoyebang and Yuanfudao. Remember a few years ago when these two companies flooded the market with ads for their "black tech" of taking photos to search homework? For homework you couldn't solve, just snap a photo and upload it to the app, and you'd get the answer quickly. With the development of AI, these two companies have been swept away by the tide of the times, but you might be curious...
A look back at how Zuoyebang and Yuanfudao initially built their question bank moat through human-powered answering, and how AI development impacted them.
@leslieloser_: Had the privilege of meeting @Zhm20220917, the best at AI transformation in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, for a few hours. Became even more certain about the following --In the AI era, those closer to production who understand the industry will reap huge startup dividends; understanding AI and boundaries is 20%, understanding production and industry is 80% --Small teams refuse inno…
The article shares insights on entrepreneurial dividends in the AI era, emphasizing that understanding industry and production is more critical than mastering AI technology. Companies prioritize actual problem-solving capabilities over the models themselves.