Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'

Hacker News Top News

Summary

A federal judge ruled that a Tulsa sheriff's deputy violated a woman's Fourth Amendment rights by searching Flock Safety's license plate database without a warrant, calling the platform 'indiscriminate mass surveillance.' The ruling, though non-precedential, adds to growing backlash including state-level cancellations and Senator Bernie Sanders' Block Flock Act.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/03/26, 11:29 PM

# Federal judge calls Flock ‘indiscriminate mass surveillance’ | TechCrunch Source: [https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/03/federal-judge-calls-flock-indiscriminate-mass-surveillance/](https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/03/federal-judge-calls-flock-indiscriminate-mass-surveillance/) A federal judge ruled this week that a Tulsa, Oklahoma sheriff’s deputy violated a woman’s Fourth Amendment rights when using Flock Safety to search for her license plate without a warrant\. As[reported by 404 Media](https://www.404media.co/federal-judge-rules-a-flock-search-was-indiscriminate-mass-surveillance-and-unconstitutional/), this ruling does not create a binding precedent, but it is one of the first times that a federal judge has ruled that a Flock search is unconstitutional\. In this case, Judge Sara Hill said the deputy should have obtained a warrant before searching the Flock database for the woman’s license plate, as he had “no apparent reason” for the search “other than the fact that \[the woman’s vehicle\] had a California license plate\.” The deputy then used the woman’s travel history in Flock as part of the justification for searching her car, where he allegedly discovered 91 pounds of meth\. But Judge Hill wrote that all evidence obtained after the Flock search “must be suppressed as the fruit of a poisonous tree\.” Judge Hill also took broader aim at warrantless searches of the Flock database, writing that tracking people’s location — even when they’re in public places — becomes “constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient\.” “This is a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance,” Hill wrote\. “It is not targeted on a single individual, as in \[*Carpenter v\. United States*, a Supreme Court case[focused on how government agencies access location data from cell phones](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States)\]\. It is a tool that collects information about all vehicles that pass by any network\-connected camera at all times, and it serves up the information to law enforcement on demand\.” Hill joins a growing chorus of Flock critics from across the political spectrum\. Numerous local and state governments,[including Florida and Texas](https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/01/florida-and-texas-move-to-block-flock-cameras-over-privacy-concerns/), have said they will stop using the technology\. And on Friday, Senator Bernie Sanders — a Democrat from Vermont —[introduced the Block Flock Act](https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/02/sanders-introduces-bill-to-ban-the-federal-government-from-using-flock/), which would bar federal agencies from using automated license plate readers such as Flock\. Flock CEO Garretty Langley — who we’ll be interviewing on\-stage at[TechCrunch Disrupt](https://techcrunch.com/events/techcrunch-disrupt/)— has[called for a “compromise” between privacy and safety](https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/23/flock-ceo-calls-for-compromise-as-surveillance-company-faces-growing-backlash/)and offered an apology to women who have been stalked by law enforcement officers using the Flock system\. And with all those cancellations, Flock has also[reportedly offered voluntary employee buyouts](https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/19/flock-reportedly-tries-to-shrink-workforce-with-employee-buyouts/)as a way to shrink its workforce\. *When you purchase through links in our articles,[we may earn a small commission](https://techcrunch.com/techcrunch-affiliate-monetization-standards/)\. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence\.* Anthony Ha is TechCrunch’s weekend editor\. Previously, he worked as a tech reporter at Adweek, a senior editor at VentureBeat, a local government reporter at the Hollister Free Lance, and vice president of content at a VC firm\. He lives in New York City\. You can contact or verify outreach from Anthony by emailing[anthony\.ha@techcrunch\.com](mailto:[email protected])\. [View Bio](https://techcrunch.com/author/anthony-ha/)

Similar Articles

Footage of the Flock search that a judge ruled was uncosntitutional

Hacker News Top

404 Media released body camera footage from the first Flock license plate reader search a federal judge ruled unconstitutional, showing how ALPR systems were used to justify a warrantless traffic stop and search, with all evidence thrown out despite a large meth seizure.

What Flock’s defenders are missing

MIT Technology Review

The article examines Flock Safety's response to police misuse of its license plate reader network, pointing out loopholes in new safeguards and broader concerns about mass surveillance and civil liberties.

Georgia man sues Flock, sheriff's office over alleged ALPR-fueled retaliation

Ars Technica

A Georgia man is suing Flock Safety and the Coweta County Sheriff's Office, alleging that searches of the company's license plate recognition (ALPR) data were used to fuel retaliation against him in violation of Georgia law and the Fourth Amendment. The case comes amid growing backlash against Flock, with hundreds of law enforcement agencies recently dropping contracts over surveillance concerns.

Flock CEO: ‘We got this one wrong’

The Verge

Flock CEO Garrett Langley apologizes and announces updates to its surveillance tools, including mandatory Audit Assistance, case codes for searches, and reducing default ALPR data retention from 30 to 7 days, after reports of police stalking via its license plate cameras. The ACLU responds skeptically, calling the changes more PR than substantive reform.