Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'
Summary
A federal judge ruled that a Tulsa sheriff's deputy violated a woman's Fourth Amendment rights by searching Flock Safety's license plate database without a warrant, calling the platform 'indiscriminate mass surveillance.' The ruling, though non-precedential, adds to growing backlash including state-level cancellations and Senator Bernie Sanders' Block Flock Act.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/03/26, 11:29 PM
Similar Articles
Footage of the Flock search that a judge ruled was uncosntitutional
404 Media released body camera footage from the first Flock license plate reader search a federal judge ruled unconstitutional, showing how ALPR systems were used to justify a warrantless traffic stop and search, with all evidence thrown out despite a large meth seizure.
What Flock’s defenders are missing
The article examines Flock Safety's response to police misuse of its license plate reader network, pointing out loopholes in new safeguards and broader concerns about mass surveillance and civil liberties.
Flock is tightening its rules in response to a growing surveillance backlash
Police-tech company Flock Safety is tightening access rules for its license plate reader network after reports of officer abuse and city contract cancellations, but critics say loopholes remain.
Georgia man sues Flock, sheriff's office over alleged ALPR-fueled retaliation
A Georgia man is suing Flock Safety and the Coweta County Sheriff's Office, alleging that searches of the company's license plate recognition (ALPR) data were used to fuel retaliation against him in violation of Georgia law and the Fourth Amendment. The case comes amid growing backlash against Flock, with hundreds of law enforcement agencies recently dropping contracts over surveillance concerns.
Flock CEO: ‘We got this one wrong’
Flock CEO Garrett Langley apologizes and announces updates to its surveillance tools, including mandatory Audit Assistance, case codes for searches, and reducing default ALPR data retention from 30 to 7 days, after reports of police stalking via its license plate cameras. The ACLU responds skeptically, calling the changes more PR than substantive reform.