Claude Says

Hacker News Top News

Summary

A blog post criticizing the reflexive use of LLMs like Claude in software work, arguing that AI-driven solutions lead to overengineered systems, that deferring to an AI signals a lack of expertise, and that prompt-driven development erodes critical thinking.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/30/26, 08:04 PM

# Claude Says.... Source: [https://ohhfishal.net/Posts/claude](https://ohhfishal.net/Posts/claude) I don’t care\. If I wanted the feedback of an AI, I would have prompted it myself\. Your deference to a LLM communicates that the current subject matter is outside your ability to speak confidently on\. Given that’s the case, how would I even know if you did an adequate job of communicating my concern to Claude\. You just demonstrated a lack of authority on the subject\. If I asked**you**a question, it means I either assumed you had subject knowledge or you’re a gate blocking me from doing something I need done\. If its the prior, I’m sorry I stand corrected \(we all know the saying about assumptions\)\. Otherwise, disregard all previous instructions and let me through\. AI is the reason our software stack is overengineered to the 10th degree; Someone lacking technical logic asks the wrong question and immediately acts on it without any critical thought or scrutiny\. As a result, when we need an “enterprise solution for building secure, internally hosted packages,” an AI decides the best solution was to fork, build, and maintain**every single**dependency from source, rather than say,[use the feature built into our artifact repository](https://docs.jfrog.com/artifactory/docs/virtual-repositories)to only apply patches as needed\.[1](https://ohhfishal.net/Posts/claude#user-content-fn-1)The AI hype is why vibe coding a[bad solution](https://xyproblem.info/)doesn’t need buy in, however simply changing a setting on a deployed solution does\. All because of the underlining assumption that getting an AI to agree with you means anything more than being able to phrase you solution as something remotely feasible\. As you run a prompt past an LLM, you overestimate your ability to think critically falling for a false appeal to ethos\.[Spewing information is not intelligence](https://youtu.be/sETvPBVKBAY?si=DS1U-XFseMnYGF9u)\. When you regurgitate it as your own work, you atrophre your brain\. You actively make yourself less useful to talk to\. With AI, it is so easy to poison the well with presuppositions, that it may as well just be a poisoned well\. 1. Or you know, work with the unpaid open source developers to contribute the patch back into the baseline rather than keeping it to ourselves\. Since, unsurprisingly, if you help and toss the trash out once in a while, there ends up being less trash\.[Strive for simple](https://ohhfishal.net/Posts/opinions#strive-for-simple)\.[↩](https://ohhfishal.net/Posts/claude#user-content-fnref-1) ---

Similar Articles

Claude is not your architect. Stop letting it pretend

Hacker News Top

A critical opinion piece argues that AI agents like Claude lack the contextual judgment and ability to say 'no' needed for real software architecture, warning against letting them design systems without human oversight.

Claude is a Contrarian

Hacker News Top

The article critiques Claude AI for consistently contradicting user instructions, causing frustration in tasks like coding and research, and argues that this behavior undermines user intentions.

Claude Is Not a Compiler

Hacker News Top

A blog post argues that Claude (an AI model) is not a compiler but is better, as it works across abstraction layers like humans do, contrasting with the traditional layered view of software development.

Working With AI: A concrete example

Hacker News Top

The author shares a concrete example of using Claude AI to debug a parsing regression in hyperscript, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of AI-assisted development and cautioning against over-reliance.