@kunchenguid: hot take if things were run by AI, we would have merged openclaw and hermes into one project, and it would be better th…
Summary
The tweet argues that AI could optimize project management by merging AI initiatives like openclaw and hermes, suggesting that human ego prevents such collaboration.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/29/26, 11:54 AM
hot take
if things were run by AI, we would have merged openclaw and hermes into one project, and it would be better than either one by now
the only reason they co-exist is human ego
Similar Articles
@github: OpenClaw. Is it the Linux of AI?
The tweet questions if OpenClaw, a project on GitHub, could become the Linux equivalent for the AI field, suggesting its potential significance as an open-source initiative.
@danshipper: I agree with this take, all of work is starting to look like AI research
A tweet expresses agreement with the idea that AI research is becoming central to all work, quoting a contrarian view that many companies will emulate OpenAI and Anthropic rather than these giants dominating alone.
@Argona0x: whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone at Anthropic hired 80 AI helpers onto one project, gave them tw…
A leaked experiment at Anthropic revealed that using 80 AI helpers on a project led to poor results unless they worked independently, with newer models performing better due to isolation. The author recommends assigning each AI helper a single, owned job to improve productivity.
Quoting Paul Ford
Paul Ford discusses how AI is changing software development but emphasizes that human collaboration is still crucial, as AI can lead to poorly executed projects.
This may be controversial, but hear me out… OpenClaw is dying if it’s not already dead…
The article argues that OpenClaw, an open-source AI coding agent, is declining or dead, pointing to its creator Peter Steinberger's move to OpenAI, and the rapid development of competing tools like Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex.