We read the ToS & Privacy Policy for 205 AI apps and graded them. Over half got a D or F.
Summary
A study graded 205 AI apps on their data governance practices, finding that over half received a D or F grade, with many apps not disclosing whether user input trains their models.
Similar Articles
Consumer Reports wrote a standard for AI that touches your money. We graded ourselves against it.
Consumer Reports published a Consumer Finance AI Standard; Pendragon, a personal finance AI company, self-graded against it, revealing strong compliance on six principles, partial on two, and failure on one.
AI governance is not a policy document
The article highlights critical governance failures in AI applications, such as wrongful arrest via facial recognition and false intelligence reports from chatbots, underscoring the need for human accountability and clear decision-making frameworks.
I trust-scored 171 open-source AI agents — most can't prove their supply chain
A developer created an independent trust registry for 171 open-source AI agents, scoring them on verifiable trust signals like supply chain security and maintenance, finding that only three agents achieved a Grade A rating while many popular agents lacked basic verification.
Today I read 74% of companies pulled their AI agents after deploying them. obviously we don't hear about this from the news
A study reveals that 74% of companies have pulled AI agents from production, with even higher rollback rates among those with mature AI governance. The core issue is not the AI models themselves but the messy, disconnected infrastructure and data they rely on.
@SaravananJ2294: Okta surveyed 292 executives this year. Only 34% apply the same security controls to AI agents that they apply to human…
Okta's survey of 292 executives reveals that only 34% apply the same security controls to AI agents as to human employees, highlighting a significant security oversight in AI adoption.