We read the ToS & Privacy Policy for 205 AI apps and graded them. Over half got a D or F.
Summary
A study graded 205 AI apps on their data governance practices, finding that over half received a D or F grade, with many apps not disclosing whether user input trains their models.
Similar Articles
I trust-scored 171 open-source AI agents — most can't prove their supply chain
A developer created an independent trust registry for 171 open-source AI agents, scoring them on verifiable trust signals like supply chain security and maintenance, finding that only three agents achieved a Grade A rating while many popular agents lacked basic verification.
Today I read 74% of companies pulled their AI agents after deploying them. obviously we don't hear about this from the news
A study reveals that 74% of companies have pulled AI agents from production, with even higher rollback rates among those with mature AI governance. The core issue is not the AI models themselves but the messy, disconnected infrastructure and data they rely on.
Is anyone actually enforcing AI governance, or just writing policies?
The article discusses the gap between documented AI governance policies and the practical enforcement of these rules within runtime AI agent workflows.
OpenAI violated Canadian privacy laws, federal and provincial watchdogs say
Canadian federal and provincial privacy watchdogs have determined that OpenAI violated privacy laws by scraping vast amounts of personal data to train ChatGPT without proper consent.
@Sumanth_077: Get a letter grade for your AI agent in under 5 minutes! iFixAi is an open-source diagnostic that catches AI operationa…
iFixAi is an open-source diagnostic tool that grades AI agents on misalignment risks across five pillars, running 45 inspections, and is provider-agnostic and CI-friendly.