@AlexanderKalian: Biology has an exteme lack of data, relative to what AI needs - I am sorry to say. I am not sure how anyone can claim o…

X AI KOLs Timeline Papers

Summary

Alexander Kalian argues that biology lacks sufficient high-quality data for AI, while César de la Fuente counters that data exists but needs better organization, highlighting the AllTheBacteria preprint as an open platform for bacterial genomes.

Biology has an exteme lack of data, relative to what AI needs - I am sorry to say. I am not sure how anyone can claim otherwise. For example, there are tens of thousands protein targets relevant to human disease. Our data on what binds to each is <20 data points, for most. It's also overwhelmingly biased to things that strongly bind, rather than things which don't. Deep learning models for molecules binding to a particular target typically need ~1,000+ data points for training, to generalise well onto new data. Deep learning models also need balance in training data. And don't get me started on data relevant to ADME, metabolites, downstream pathways, protein-protein interactions, different proteoforms, epigenetics, toxicology etc.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/22/26, 06:35 PM

Biology has an exteme lack of data, relative to what AI needs - I am sorry to say.

I am not sure how anyone can claim otherwise.

For example, there are tens of thousands protein targets relevant to human disease. Our data on what binds to each is <20 data points, for most.

It’s also overwhelmingly biased to things that strongly bind, rather than things which don’t.

Deep learning models for molecules binding to a particular target typically need ~1,000+ data points for training, to generalise well onto new data.

Deep learning models also need balance in training data.

And don’t get me started on data relevant to ADME, metabolites, downstream pathways, protein-protein interactions, different proteoforms, epigenetics, toxicology etc.

César de la Fuente (@delafuentelab): Biology has no shortage of data. The challenge is to organize it well enough that scientists—and machines—can learn from it.

Our latest preprint presents AllTheBacteria: an open, community-built platform that transforms 2.44 million public bacterial and archaeal genomes into a

Similar Articles

Preprint: "Is biology necessary to advance biology?" A team of engineers, AI-using biologists, and philosophers argue that AI maps known biology, but embodied scientists are still needed to find what models miss.

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

A preprint arguing that AI can map known biology but cannot perform 'kind formation'—the minting of new variables and constraints—which requires the embodied engagement of human scientists. The authors propose a curriculum to train scientists as 'detectors of the unparameterized' to complement AI in biological discovery.

Jun 8, 2026SciencePaving the way for agents in biology

Anthropic Research

Anthropic researcher Laura Luebbert argues that biological data infrastructure needs to be redesigned for AI agents, using a case study where even strong models failed to reliably retrieve sequence data from NCBI Virus until a deterministic retrieval layer was added.