Preprint: "Is biology necessary to advance biology?" A team of engineers, AI-using biologists, and philosophers argue that AI maps known biology, but embodied scientists are still needed to find what models miss.

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence Papers

Summary

A preprint arguing that AI can map known biology but cannot perform 'kind formation'—the minting of new variables and constraints—which requires the embodied engagement of human scientists. The authors propose a curriculum to train scientists as 'detectors of the unparameterized' to complement AI in biological discovery.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/14/26, 02:23 PM

# Is Biology Necessary to Advance Biology? Source: [https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/13696/](https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/13696/) ## Downloads [Download Preprint](https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/object/13696/download/24463/) ## Authors John T Van Stan, II[![](https://ecoevorxiv.org/static/common/img/icons/orcid.gif)](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-7064), Theodore Bach, Olivier Dangles, Robert Guralnick, Sarah Huebner, Roland Kays, Justin Kitzes, Robert A Krebs, Benjamin Noren, Jarrad H\. Van Stan, Michael O Wiitala, Roman Yampolskiy ## Abstract AI is transforming the workflow of biological science\. But what role remains for human cognition when the priority is deep theory? We propose a division of labor based on a “coverage asymmetry” between artificial and biological agents\. AI excels at extending the encounterable: scaling known mechanisms and exploring complex parameter regimes\. However, AI cannot \(yet\) perform kind formation – the minting of new variables and constraints – because it is bounded by its training ontology\. Current systems cannot register that their own vocabulary is incomplete, because recognizing missing variables requires material participation in the system under study\. We leverage phenomenological philosophy to argue that new kinds originate in Wild Being: the embodied friction that occurs when an organism encounters something its current categories cannot name \(an Out\-of\-Ontology encounter\)\. We outline a curriculum to train human scientists as “detectors of the unparameterized,” ensuring that the growth of knowledge remains coupled to the growth of care\. The question is not whether AI can do biology, but how we design systems to maximize discovery efficiency, producing both knowledge and knowers whose embodied engagement guides what that knowledge is for\. ## DOI [https://doi\.org/10\.32942/X2310W](https://doi.org/10.32942/X2310W) ## Subjects Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology, Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Biology, Cell and Developmental Biology, Computational Biology, Philosophy, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Systems Biology ## Keywords artificial intelligence, biological discovery, ontology, embodied cognition, out\-of\-distribution, epistemology ## Dates **Published:**2026\-07\-14 08:32 **Last Updated:**2026\-07\-14 08:32 ## Older Versions - [Version 3 \- 2026\-07\-14](https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/object/13696/download/24463/) - [Version 2 \- 2026\-07\-14](https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/object/13696/download/24462/) - [Version 1 \- 2026\-07\-09](https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/object/13696/download/24049/) ## License [CC\-BY Attribution\-NonCommercial 4\.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode) ## Additional Metadata **Conflict of interest statement:** None **Language:** English ## Metrics **Views:**39 **Downloads:**2

Similar Articles

Preparing for future AI risks in biology

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI publishes a comprehensive approach to managing dual-use risks from advanced AI models in biology, outlining strategies for enabling beneficial scientific discovery while preventing misuse for bioweapons development through expert collaboration, model training, detection systems, and security controls.

AI Science & Economy: Systems Map

Reddit r/artificial

This article argues that while AI excels at pattern recognition and hypothesis generation, scientific and economic progress requires grounded interaction with reality and institutional execution, emphasizing the need for human-AI collaboration.