OpenAI lost its trademark dispute at the European Union General Court, which ruled that 'OPENAI' is descriptive for software and IT services, lacking distinctiveness for trademark protection.
# OpenAI loses trademark dispute at EU court
Source: [https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/](https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/)
15\.07\.2026, 14:24 Uhr
OpenAI, the US company behind ChatGPT, has lost its legal challenge against the refusal to register the trademark "OPENAI" at the European Union's General Court\.
The Luxembourg\-based court ruled that, for certain software and information technology goods and services, the term is purely descriptive and therefore lacks the distinctiveness required for trademark protection\. The ruling can still be appealed to the European Court of Justice\.
The court's judgment upheld a decision by the EU Intellectual Property Office \(EUIPO\)\. The office had partially rejected OpenAI's application for trademark registration, for example in relation to software and cloud computing services\.
The EUIPO found that the word "open" would be understood by the relevant public as meaning freely accessible, while the combination with "AI" \(artificial intelligence\) would be interpreted as referring to products based on openly accessible artificial intelligence\.
OpenAI had argued that the word "open" has multiple possible meanings and that "OPENAI" is a coined term without a fixed meaning\. The company also cited comparable trademark registrations previously granted by the EUIPO and registrations in more than 30 other countries, including the United Kingdom and Singapore\.
The court rejected these arguments\. It ruled that the combination of words was not an unusual linguistic combination in English\. Furthermore, registrations in other jurisdictions were not binding under EU trademark law\.
- [Court ruling](https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/document/T/2025/T-0555-25-00000000PI-01-P-01/ARRET_NP/323775-EN-1-html)
\(c\) 2026 dpa Deutsche Presse Agentur GmbH
The New York Times alleges OpenAI misled the court by claiming it couldn't search training data for copyrighted material, despite having previously done so and deleting billions of chat logs. The case raises concerns about transparency and accountability in AI companies.
A court rejected Elon Musk's request for a preliminary injunction against OpenAI, dismissing several of his claims. OpenAI reaffirms that its nonprofit structure is not being dissolved and will hold a significant stake in its proposed public-benefit corporation.
OpenAI has responded to Apple's trade secret lawsuit, denying the allegations and stating they lack merit, while the legal dispute unfolds over alleged theft of confidential information from Apple employees who joined OpenAI.
OpenAI faces calls for sanctions after allegedly hiding and deleting ChatGPT logs relevant to the NYT copyright lawsuit, potentially undermining its fair-use defense.