The New York Times and several other publications sued Brave Software, alleging it unlawfully scraped their content to train AI and supplied it to companies like Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere, while also letting users bypass paywalls.
<figure>
<img alt="" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="NurPhoto via Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/11/gettyimages-2289911637.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100" />
<figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The New York Times</em> and a group of other publications have <a href="https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2026/11/new-york-times-brave-complaint-11-2-26.pdf">filed lawsuits</a> against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/new-york-times-sues-maker-brave-web-browser-over-copyrights-2026-11-02/?link_source=ta_bluesky_link&taid=6ae8b70f401f6f00010d16d6">as reported by <em>Reuters</em></a>.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.676310/gov.uscourts.nysd.676310.1.0.pdf">a complaint</a> filed by the companies that run <em>New York Daily News</em>, the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>, and the <em>Orlando Sentinel</em>, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to "real-time online content from the Brave Index." The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to "respond to specific user queries," or bo …</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/1024588/brave-lawsuit-ai-scraping-new-york-times">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
# The New York Times sues Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls
Source: [https://www.theverge.com/tech/1024588/brave-lawsuit-ai-scraping-new-york-times](https://www.theverge.com/tech/1024588/brave-lawsuit-ai-scraping-new-york-times)
*The New York Times*and a group of other publications have[filed lawsuits](https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2026/11/new-york-times-brave-complaint-11-2-26.pdf)against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls,[as reported by*Reuters*](https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/new-york-times-sues-maker-brave-web-browser-over-copyrights-2026-11-02/?link_source=ta_bluesky_link&taid=6ae8b70f401f6f00010d16d6)\.
According to[a complaint](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.676310/gov.uscourts.nysd.676310.1.0.pdf)filed by the companies that run*New York Daily News*, the*Chicago Tribune*, and the*Orlando Sentinel*, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to “real\-time online content from the Brave Index\.” The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to “respond to specific user queries,” or both\. Brave has allegedly provided “stolen copyrighted content” to “many” AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere\.
Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser\.
“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says\. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without
their consent, and has taken other steps that prevent the Publishers from blocking Brave’s access to the Publishers’ websites\. Brave has never compensated the Publishers for the unlawful use, copying, and distribution of the Publishers’ copyrighted content\.”
“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” Graham James, an*NYT*spokesperson, says in a statement\. “We filed this lawsuit to hold Brave accountable for stealing our content to power its own products and to provide it to some of the most prominent and well resourced generative AI companies in the world\.”
Brave, Anthropic, Mistral, SpaceXSI, and Cohere, didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment\. “*The New York Times*is overpaying its attorneys and underpaying its journalists\. \(Who could’ve easily identified the disinformation in this suit\.\)” Jesse Dwyer, Perplexity’s chief communications officer, says in a statement to*The Verge*\.
**Follow topics and authors**from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates\.
- Jay Peters
The New York Times and other major outlets sued Brave, alleging it scraped over 30 billion web pages and distributed copyrighted content to AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere.
New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger discusses the newspaper's $20 million lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft over copyright infringement, the threats to journalism from AI and the Trump administration, and the future of news in the digital age.
USA Today and several of its local newspapers sued OpenAI, seeking over $250 million in damages, alleging the company copied hundreds of thousands of articles without permission to train its AI models.
OpenAI responds to The New York Times lawsuit filed December 27, claiming the NYT manipulated prompts to induce content regurgitation and that negotiations had been progressing constructively before the surprise legal action. OpenAI disputes the characterization that NYT content meaningfully contributed to model training and defends its practices around content reproduction.
OpenAI is publicly opposing a New York Times legal demand for 20 million user ChatGPT conversations, arguing it violates user privacy and breaks security practices. The company commits to strengthening privacy protections including client-side encryption and reiterates its resistance to similar previous demands.