@cyrilXBT: Nemotron 3 Ultra versus DeepSeek V4 versus MiniMax M3 versus Qwen 3.7 Max. Same two prompts. Four frontier models. One …
Summary
A comparison of four frontier AI models (Nemotron 3 Ultra, DeepSeek V4, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Max) on the same two prompts, with full results linked.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/08/26, 03:13 AM
Nemotron 3 Ultra versus DeepSeek V4 versus MiniMax M3 versus Qwen 3.7 Max.
Same two prompts. Four frontier models. One honest comparison.
Fast. Genuinely good. More impressive than the benchmarks suggested.
Full results below.
Bookmark this before your next model decision. https://t.co/SE1ltOl5Lq
Similar Articles
Big Model Value Wars - DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M3
A discussion comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and MiniMax M3 for best value in local or openrouter use, with a focus on agentic and coding tasks, and mentions of Hermes Agent and Qwen 3.6 variants.
Qwen 3.8 27b vs Deepseek Flash
The post compares the open-source AI models Qwen 3.8 (27B) and Deepseek Flash, discussing benchmarks and seeking user experiences to evaluate their performance.
@TheAhmadOsman: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 beats Qwen 3.8 27B btw
Ahmad tweets that DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 outperforms Qwen 3.8 27B, and lists other models like Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, and MiniMax H3.
Thoughts on Qwen 3.7 Max Preview vs Minimax M3 and OpenAI 5.6 Sol
A comparative analysis of the Qwen 3.7 Max Preview, Minimax M3, and OpenAI 5.6 Sol models, offering thoughts on their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Tested 4 brand new frontier models (2 Chinese, 1 diffusion, 1 agent-focused) with a riddle that has no logical shortcut. One of them fabricated sources four times in a row.
A test of four new frontier AI models (MiMo-V2.5-Pro, MiniMax M3, Mercury 2, LongCat-2.0) using riddles that require genuine reasoning rather than pattern-matching reveals that while most models perform reasonably, LongCat-2.0 repeatedly generates fabricated information with false confidence.