@trq212: related to this- I think bash is no longer all you need, if your goal is just reliably tool calling but sandboxes + bas…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

Thariq argues that MCPs are better than CLIs for AI tool calling due to improved model capabilities and MCP's stateless design, while bash and sandboxes are still good for code generation and execution.

related to this- I think bash is no longer all you need, if your goal is just reliably tool calling but sandboxes + bash are still good for work that involves code generation & execution
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/17/26, 12:28 PM

related to this- I think bash is no longer all you need, if your goal is just reliably tool calling

but sandboxes + bash are still good for work that involves code generation & execution

Thariq (@trq212): I was not expecting things to go this way, but I think MCPs are better than CLIs for most integrations.

The models have gotten much better at tool calling, we can defer tools & MCP is now stateless.

If you need to compose/filter data, add params like query to your MCP tools.

Similar Articles

Skill + CLI or MCP

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The author discusses their growing trust in LLMs and seeks advice on whether using AI skills with CLI tools or MCP servers is more optimized for token usage and less error-prone in software development.