Concerns about the ICLR review policy [D]
Summary
The author expresses concerns about ICLR's review policy that requires individuals to serve as reviewers if they appear on 3 or more papers, regardless of their qualifications.
Similar Articles
ACL Sustainable Reviewing Policy [D]
ACL has announced changes to its reviewing policy, requiring submissions to include a qualified reviewer or face a lottery, with caps on total and first-author submissions per cycle.
Why doesn't the ML research community limit the number of submissions per author? [D]
A researcher questions why the ML community doesn't limit submissions per author to manage review quality, citing successful practices in other fields like Security and Computer Architecture.
AAAI 2027 Reviewer Bidding and Assignment Integrity [D]
The article discusses collusion in the AAAI 2027 review process, particularly in reviewer assignment cycles, and critiques the lack of code publication in accepted papers at top AI conferences.
[ICML 2026] Scores increased and then decreased!! [D]
A researcher discusses their ICML 2026 paper review experience where a reviewer increased their score during rebuttal but then decreased it again, expressing concern about rejection prospects.
AC comment and our reply disappeared on OpenReview [D]
A user on OpenReview noticed that an Area Chair's comment and their reply have disappeared, raising concerns about potential bias in paper rejection decisions. They are seeking confirmation from others if this is a normal occurrence.