If you are asking for human attention, demonstrate human effort

Hacker News Top News

Summary

A software engineer discusses the etiquette of sharing AI-generated content with teammates, proposing the principle that if you request human attention, you should demonstrate human effort by adding your own commentary.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/12/26, 02:53 AM

# If You are Asking for Human Attention, Demonstrate Human Effort Source: [https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/](https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/) An ever\-increasing volume of debug investigations, document writing, and code is written by robots\. This has created a new etiquette question when working with a team \- when is it OK to forward the output of an AI to another human to read? On one hand, an AI with robust integration to internal code bases and documentation often produces genuinely[1](https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/#user-content-fn-1-57b299)useful output\. On the other, as an increasing amount of a software engineer's day is spent reading AI text, a fatigue sets in\.*If I can have a robot say something, so can you*\. It reads as inconsiderate to post un\-digested AI output as though it's your own writing\. I remember the first time I experienced this annoyance\. I proposed a design, and a teammate prompted an AI to critique it\. The teammate sent an AI document to me, with the disclaimer: "I didn't read this, so it might not be entirely accurate"\. My thought was, \_if reading this wasn't worth your time, why is it worth mine?" Therefore, I've adopted this principle in my work: ***If you are requesting human attention, demonstrate human effort\.*** If useful, I send AI generated content to teammates\. But when doing so, I take care to clearly label what is AI generated, and I add my own commentary alongside it\. For human code review requests, I*always*review my AI\-generated code first\. [Attention was already a scarce resource](https://tombedor.dev/how-to-write-good-short-docs/#optimize-for-short-attention-spans)before AI, and it is even more so now\. Keeping AI generated content clearly labeled and demonstrating human effort helps show consideration for teammates, and keeps a touch of humanity alive in our work\. 1. I promise I wrote this \(and all the words in this post\) with my meat fingers\![↩](https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/#user-content-fnref-1-57b299)

Similar Articles

Don't be a meat proxy

Hacker News Top

A blog post criticizing the habit of relaying verbatim AI responses in conversations and code reviews, urging readers to understand, validate, and paraphrase AI output to add real value.

Quoting Greg Brockman

Simon Willison's Blog

Greg Brockman shares an observation that people dislike being contacted by a coworker's ChatGPT for help, highlighting the value of human relationships and the desire for AI to enhance rather than replace human interaction.

Human understanding is *still* needed more than ever

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

A commentary emphasizing that despite AI advances, human understanding remains crucial for safe and humane deployment, urging users to verify AI outputs and treat AI with respect.