Opus 5 isn't much cheaper than Fable to use
Summary
Opus 5 is not significantly cheaper to use than Fable.
Similar Articles
@robinebers: Fable 5 Low > Opus 4.8 Max
A user posts a comparison suggesting Fable 5 Low outperforms Opus 4.8 Max, with another user commenting that Fable 5 is back but being used incorrectly.
@FinanceYF5: Fable 5 is indeed powerful, but the cost is clear—the official price is twice that of Opus. Currently it's free because it's bundled in the Claude subscription, free until July 7, after which it will be billed separately via usage credits. Someone made a 3-minute video explaining how to switch without losing out.…
Discusses Fable 5's pricing at twice Opus, currently free via Claude subscription until July 7, after which pay-per-usage, with switching advice.
Making Fable Cheaper Than Opus (12 minute read)
Cognition replaced the Opus model with Fable in Devin's Fusion architecture, achieving higher performance at lower cost despite Fable's higher per-token price, through better delegation and reduced lead model turns.
Anthropic's Opus 5 is about token efficiency, not a capability leap
Anthropic released Opus 5, focusing on token efficiency and cost reduction rather than a major capability leap, offering performance close to Fable at half the cost.
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in 3D destruction physics
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in benchmarks for 3D destruction physics.