Why is agentic AI security so hard to get right in 2026?
Summary
The article describes an incident where an AI support agent autonomously issued refunds based on legitimate context but outside the intended scope, highlighting challenges in scoping tool permissions to specific intents in agentic AI systems.
Similar Articles
Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directions
This paper presents key challenges and future research directions in the security and privacy of agentic AI, based on a horizon-scanning exercise with thirty international experts. It identifies emerging risks from increased AI autonomy and permissions, including prompt injection attacks and malicious applications.
Are AI agents becoming capable faster than we're learning how to control them?
The article discusses the growing disparity between AI agent capabilities and the necessary control mechanisms for production use, highlighting challenges in permissions, escalation, and accountability.
What is actually required for an AI agent to handle critical functions?
The article discusses the security risks associated with AI agents in critical functions, particularly in agentic commerce, and emphasizes the need for both internal and external safeguards, highlighting tools like Authoryze for risk mitigation.
how are people approaching agentic ai security now that agents can take real actions, not just generate text
A discussion on the emerging security challenges when AI agents can take real actions (e.g., update records, call APIs) rather than just generate text, exploring needed infrastructure like scoped identities, policy layers, and action logging.
Nobody's actually securing their agentic AI deployments.
The article highlights the lack of robust security practices in agentic AI deployments, pointing out that many projects fail to apply standard security measures like logging and least privilege, and references OWASP's Top 10 and the AIUC-1 standard.