@CodeByPoonam: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it …
Summary
The tweet claims that the open-source Kimi K2.6 model has surpassed Claude Opus 4.7, marking a significant milestone for open-source AI in just three months. It provides a link to a full guide and prompts to verify the comparison.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/11/26, 12:42 PM
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6
It’s not even close.
3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did.
Full guide with Prompt 👇 https://t.co/ffhtNmamDG
Similar Articles
@akshay_pachaar: Kimi K2.6 raises the bar for open-source models. Moonshot released it yesterday, and for the first time, an open-weight…
Moonshot's open-weight Kimi K2.6 matches Claude Opus 4.6 on key agentic benchmarks while costing significantly less.
Two open-sourced models from china just blew claude opus 4.6 out of water. (Kimi 2.6 and xiaomi mimo v2.5 pro)
Chinese teams open-sourced Kimi 2.6 and Xiaomi MiMo v2.5 Pro, reportedly surpassing Claude Opus 4.6 benchmarks.
Kimi K2.6 is a legit Opus 4.7 replacement
A user reports that Kimi K2.6 is a strong alternative to Claude Opus 4.7, capable of handling ~85% of tasks at comparable quality while offering vision and browser-use capabilities, suggesting frontier models may not always offer unique advantages.
@EvanLuthra: Kimi K2 was trained for $4.6 MILLION. GPT-5 reportedly cost hundreds of millions. Kimi still beats it on coding. Last w…
Kimi K2, trained for $4.6 million, outperforms GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4.7 on coding benchmarks, with a detailed breakdown from its founder.
@heyshrutimishra: OpenClaw users are gonna love it Finally an open source model that beats Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench It's Kimi K2.6, it runs …
Kimi K2.6 open-source model surpasses Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench, supporting 12+ hour autonomous coding sessions with 4,000+ tool calls.