@MiaAI_lab: The Orinth-1.0-35b MoE looks way better than the Qwen 3.6 35b, especially in Terminal-Bench 2.1 & SWE Atlas.
Summary
The Orinth-1.0-35b MoE outperforms Qwen 3.6 35b on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SWE Atlas benchmarks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/26/26, 12:11 PM
The Orinth-1.0-35b MoE looks way better than the Qwen 3.6 35b, especially in Terminal-Bench 2.1 & SWE Atlas. https://t.co/dDt2GZjxuO
Similar Articles
@TeksEdge: Been testing Orinth-1.0-35B to see how it stacks up with Qwen3.6-35B over a day's use. Anecdotally, it works as well as…
A user reports that Ornith-1.0-35B matches Qwen3.6-35B in performance but excels at planning and long task execution, while the developer announces the open-source Ornith-1.0 family of LLMs specialized for agentic coding.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B are officially on the public Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard!
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Qwen3.5-9B models are officially on the Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard, with little-coder achieving 24.6% on the 35B variant, surpassing Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3-Coder-480B, while the 9B model shows that sub-10B local models can compete on hard agentic benchmarks.
The Qwen 3.6 35B A3B hype is real!!!
The author benchmarks small local LLMs, highlighting Qwen 3.6 35B A3B for its superior ability to map academic code to research papers compared to models like Gemma 4 and Nemotron 3 Nano.
Local benchmarks with a RTX 3090 - Qwen3.6 27b vs Ornith
User runs local benchmarks comparing Qwen3.6 27b, Gemma4 26B, and Ornith1.0 35B on an RTX 3090 using inspect-ai. Results show Qwen leading in knowledge and coding, while Ornith is competitive in grounding and recall.
@MiaAI_lab: If you mainly use local LLMs for Hermes-style agentic loops, this might surprise you: Qwen 3.6 35B actually *beats* Dee…
Qwen 3.6 35B outperforms DeepSeek v4 Flash on tool-heavy and coding-adjacent workflows, according to benchmarks from MiaAI Lab.