@passluo: Let me brag a bit. After CC Max delists fable 5 tonight, we'll most likely continue to offer it at the same price for now. Tested today, error rate is about 3%. Let's see if it blows up tonight and proves me wrong.
Summary
CC Max will continue to offer the service after delisting fable 5, at the same price. Current test error rate is about 3%, but concerned about potential issues after launch.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/07/26, 11:29 AM
I’m going to show off a little.
After CC Max takes fable 5 offline tonight,
we’ll most likely still be able to offer it.
Price stays the same for now.
Tested it today—error rate is around 3%.
Let’s see if tonight blows up and makes me look stupid 🤪
Similar Articles
@RookieRicardoR: Fable 5 Max, five tasks, 3300 lines of code, ran for 90 minutes, is this right?
Discusses the performance of Fable 5 Max (five tasks, 3300 lines of code, 90 minutes) and notes that with the latest version of Claude Code (170), Fable 5's cost is twice that of Ops 4.8.
@FinanceYF5: 1/ Someone ran 3 tasks with Fable 5. The $200 Max membership, 5-hour quota depleted 73%. He said he was stunned. Not because it's expensive — because Opus 4.8 never produced anything like this. A thread explains clearly
A user ran 3 tasks using the Fable 5 model, consuming 73% of the Max membership's 5-hour quota, sparking discussions as Opus 4.8 never consumed resources in this way.
@FinanceYF5: Fable 5 is back, but the threshold is higher. Anthropic says it updated network security protections after communicating with the US government. In the short term, more normal programming requests will be falsely blocked. Once triggered, it will directly switch to Opus 4.8 replies. The biochemistry classifier has not been modified for now and is still too strict; even basic questions may be blocked. Promotion until 7/…
Anthropic updated the network security protection of Fable 5, causing more normal programming requests to be falsely blocked, and automatically switching to Opus 4.8 replies. The biochemistry classifier remains strict. The promotion lasts until 7/7.
@seclink: 现在 Fable 5 确实是太贵了 ...
Fable 5 被批评价格过高，而 GLM 5.3 在3D网站设计中表现更优且成本仅为Fable 5的约1/15，突显了AI模型的成本效益比较。
@mylifcc: https://x.com/mylifcc/status/2073053339714212161
The article emphasizes that when using strong reasoning models like Fable 5, one should prioritize auditing and reconstructing one's personal work operating system (such as coding, AI lab, content synthesis, etc.) rather than directly using them for coding. Through system-level upgrades, a compounding effect can be achieved, significantly improving the quality and efficiency of all subsequent outputs.