Unpopular opinion: Most 'AI agencies' are going to zero. Here's why domain specialists will eat their lunch
Summary
The author argues that most AI agencies will fail because they compete on price, while domain specialists who focus on a specific industry can charge much more by offering proven solutions to specific problems.
Similar Articles
Most AI agent startups will disappear within 2 years
The article argues that most AI agent startups are not true agents and will disappear within two years, as open-source tools like Claude Code enable solo developers to build what previously required full teams, shifting advantage from model size to execution and reliability.
Let's talk about the business side of the AI agents
An analysis of the AI agents business landscape, splitting the market into generalist enterprise agents, specialist agents, and consumer agents, and arguing that startups like Lovable and Legora struggle against frontier labs that subsidize plans and own the model layer, relying on VC funding and workflow lock-in to survive.
@LotusDecoder: There's a lot of public opinion making noise about how AI will eliminate human jobs in the future, but from my own hand…
A commenter argues that general-purpose LLMs and agents struggle with second-order optimization, implicit expertise, and data-scarce domains, so work will instead become more abundant and specialized rather than being eliminated by AI.
Domain expertise has always been the real moat
The article argues that agentic AI tools shift the bottleneck from coding ability to domain expertise, making those who can verify correctness in both code and domain the most valuable.
After building AI agents across a bunch of different industries, the ones that worked weren't where I expected
A practitioner reflects on building AI agents across multiple industries and finds that narrow, industry-specific, unglamorous use cases deliver real value, while broad 'AI runs the whole workflow' demos consistently underdeliver.