If AI is so great why is it so hard to see any tangible results?
Summary
This article critiques major technology companies for failing to deliver impactful new products or features despite significant AI investments, questioning the tangible results in the industry.
Similar Articles
What’s one thing AI still does surprisingly badly?
The article prompts readers to share real-world experiences where AI still consistently fails, focusing on its current shortcomings in practical applications.
AI was supposed to win people over by now — it hasn’t
The article reports on the growing public distrust towards AI in the US, citing multiple polls and reports, and highlights how this sentiment is becoming a business challenge for tech companies.
How's Ai adoption really going in big non-technical companies? Is it really transformational or is it just management BS?
A worker at a FTSE100 company expresses frustration over AI adoption challenges, noting that despite pressure to use AI, the company struggles with basic data quality and user adoption, and questions if the transformation will actually happen.
How is spending 750 billion on AI slop that nobody wants makes any sense?
Multiple studies show low consumer preference for generative AI, zero productivity impact for most firms, and zero ROI from corporate AI projects, raising doubts about massive AI investments. Data includes Gartner's finding that half of US adults prefer brands without AI, an NBER paper showing 90% of firms see no productivity gain, and an MIT study tracking 95% of corporate AI projects at zero ROI.
If Ai companies want the general public on their side they need to start showing breakthroughs
This article argues that AI companies need to showcase tangible breakthroughs in health, science, and transportation to gain public support, rather than just highlighting creative applications.