How are you actually handling done-verification, stall detection and hard limits on agent runs?
Summary
The article discusses practical challenges in running AI agents unattended, such as verifying completion, detecting stalls, and setting hard limits, and seeks advice on effective frameworks or custom solutions.
Similar Articles
what actually stops an unattended agent from looping, overspending, or saying "done" when it isn't?
This post discusses common challenges with unattended AI agents, such as looping, overspending, and incorrect task completion, and asks how practitioners handle issues like verification, stall detection, and hard limits in production.
Everyone caps their agent so a human can still check the output. Has anyone actually solved that?
The article questions the common practice of limiting AI agent runs for human verification and explores structural alternatives when task volumes exceed human oversight capacity.
How do you handle the 'verification gap' when an agent completes a long-running task?
Discusses the difficulty of verifying outputs from autonomous agents after long-running tasks and asks about using critic agents or traceability tools to ensure trustworthiness.
What mechanisms are you using to distinguish "agent busy" from "task completed"?
This article discusses an anti-pattern in AI agent systems where agents appear busy but fail to complete tasks. The author suggests separating responsibilities and requiring proof of completion as a solution.
Is there a good execution layer for agents, or is everyone building this themselves?
The author explores challenges in building execution layers for AI agents to handle retries, partial failures, and verification when interacting with multiple apps, and inquires about existing solutions or community practices.