@rohanpaul_ai: During a Bloomberg interview, Yann LeCun (@ylecun ) explains why LLMs are limited in terms of real-world intelligence d…
Summary
Yann LeCun explains in a Bloomberg interview that LLMs are limited because they only process symbolic text, while real-world understanding requires massive sensory data that children naturally acquire. He invokes Moravec's paradox to highlight the gap.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/06/26, 08:03 AM
During a Bloomberg interview, Yann LeCun (@ylecun ) explains why LLMs are limited in terms of real-world intelligence during a Bloomberg interview.
“Language is a very approximate, reduced, quantized, and simplified description of the world, and LLMs can only deal with discrete sequences of symbols. The world is much more complicated than language.
The biggest LLMs are pre-trained on the totality of all the publicly available text on the internet. That’s about 20 trillion words, or 30 trillion tokens.
A token is about 3 bytes. So total 10¹⁴ bytes of text.
This is the amount of data a four-year-old has seen through vision during four years. Now, the text, though, would take 400,000 years to read?
So, there is enormously more data from sensory input, like vision, touch, and everything else, than there could ever be through language.“
A child does not need 400,000 years of reading to understand cups, doors, balance, faces, falls, or heat, because the body is already collecting dense feedback from vision, touch, motion, and consequence.
Text strips most of that away.
It turns a living scene into symbols, then asks the model to infer the missing world from traces left by people describing it.
That is why an LLM can sound fluent about physics and still have no native sense of how fragile glass feels in a hand.
Moravec’s paradox names this reversal: the things humans find intellectual can be easier for machines than the things toddlers do without applause.
The hard part is not producing an answer, but building a model of the world that survives contact with weight, friction, surprise, and failure.
Link to the full video on Bloomberg’s site. Link in comment.
Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai): “100 million words context window is already possible, which is roughly what a human hears in a lifetime. Inference support is the only bottleneck to achieve it.
And AI Models actually do learn during the context window, without changing the weights.“
~ Anthropic CEO Dario
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: Yann LeCun says LLMs aren’t a bubble in value or investment—they’ll drive many real-world applications and justify curr…
Yann LeCun argues that LLMs are not a bubble in value or investment, as they will drive many real-world applications and justify current infrastructure spending; the actual bubble is in assuming LLMs can achieve human-level thinking.
@haider1: Yann LeCun says LLMs are strongest in domains where language itself is the substrate of reasoning, like math and code T…
Yann LeCun states that LLMs are strongest in domains where language is the substrate of reasoning, like math and code, but they are not creative mathematicians, software architects, or computer scientists.
AI for the Real World: A conversation with Yann LeCun (12 minute read)
Yann LeCun argues that large language models lack true intelligence because they do not understand the physical world; he advocates for developing 'world models' that learn causality and enable planning for real-world applications.
@scion_x_: Yann LeCun is probably going to win the scientific debate on AI. And it won't matter one bit. The summary fits in two l…
This article argues that while Yann LeCun may be scientifically correct that LLMs lack true intelligence, their practical utility means they have already won in the marketplace.
@rohanpaul_ai: Terence Tao says the math behind today’s LLMs is actually simple. Training and running them mostly uses linear algebra,…
Terence Tao states that the mathematics underlying modern LLMs is simple, using basic linear algebra and calculus, but the unpredictability of model performance across tasks remains a mystery due to the complex nature of natural language data.