Fable 5 benchmark with remotion video
Summary
Fable 5 shows overall improvement over Opus 4.8 in video generation benchmarks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro demonstrates more artistic vision despite issues with tool calls and buggy code.
Similar Articles
Fable 5.1 is different!
Fable 5.1 is exceptional for scientific work, surpassing GPT 5.6 and Opus 5 based on user experience.
Fable 5 below even Gemini 3.1 on Livebench
A discussion on LiveBench results showing Fable 5 performing below Gemini 3.1, questioning whether the benchmark is flawed or Anthropic is optimizing for benchmarks.
ProgramBench result for Fable 5 is in, doubling Opus 4.8 even with 4.8 fallback "99% of the runs"
ProgramBench results show Fable 5 achieving double the performance of Opus 4.8, even with fallback to 4.8 in 99% of runs.
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in 3D destruction physics
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in benchmarks for 3D destruction physics.
@VraserX: Fable 5.1 looks genuinely impressive on the benchmarks, especially agentic research and coding, but this still feels li…
The tweet comments on Fable 5.1's impressive benchmarks in agentic research and coding but views it as incremental, expressing more interest in OpenAI's Astra for its potential persistent memory.