@redp314: got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second 6 real PRs in the video. $0.00007 e…

X AI KOLs Following Tools

Summary

A tool called Jev provides automated pull request reviews, claiming to be 200x cheaper and faster than Claude, with specific typed checks and escalation for uncertain cases.

got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second 6 real PRs in the video. $0.00007 each. 1,000 PRs = 7 cents vs ~$14.50 on Opus 5 paste a diff → ONE call to @typesafeai → 14 typed checks come back as probabilities: hardcoded secret, sql injection, touches auth, deletes tests, breaks api, migration, debug leftovers, does the description actually match the diff, blast radius, reviewer effort… code turns that into a verdict: BLOCK / security review / nits / merge. anything a critical check isn't sure about (0.35–0.65) gets escalated to a human or a big model instead of guessed
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/18/26, 10:45 PM

got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second

6 real PRs in the video. 0.00007 each. 1,000 PRs = 7 cents vs ~14.50 on Opus 5

paste a diff → ONE call to @typesafeai → 14 typed checks come back as probabilities: hardcoded secret, sql injection, touches auth, deletes tests, breaks api, migration, debug leftovers, does the description actually match the diff, blast radius, reviewer effort…

code turns that into a verdict: BLOCK / security review / nits / merge. anything a critical check isn’t sure about (0.35–0.65) gets escalated to a human or a big model instead of guessed

Similar Articles

Jev Based Code Review

Hacker News Top

Jev-Code-Reviewer is a GitHub extension and CLI tool that helps developers review pull requests from AI agents by classifying changes into priority levels and providing natural language explanations of code diffs.

I let Codex review the PR Claude wrote

Reddit r/AI_Agents

An individual shares an experience where Codex reviewed a pull request written by Claude, finding a real bug that another tool also flagged, raising questions about the efficacy of having multiple AI agents check each other's work.